21st-quarterly-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Twenty-First Quarterly Report of the Independent Monitor
for the Oakland Police Department
May 4, 2015
Page 85
Appendix B
Selected Inactive Task Assessments
During this reporting period, we conducted our own audits of inactive Tasks 1 and 13; and
we reviewed the Use of Force Reporting Review audit recently conducted by the Office of
Inspector General. We discuss our findings below.
Task 1, IAD Staffing and Resources
During this reporting period, we conducted an assessment of inactive Task 1.
Task 1 requires the following:
• Task 1.1: IAD assignments are made in accordance with the IAD manual (compliance
standard: 85%).
• Task 1.2: IAD rotations are in accordance with the IAD manual (compliance standard:
85%). Specifically, this subtask requires that any rotation to IAD is exempt from the
transfer policy (compliance standard: Yes/No); IAD is a career development opportunity
within OPD (compliance standard: Yes/No); IAD considers rotation of personnel on an
annual basis when preparing performance appraisals and this consideration is
documented (compliance standard: 85%); and IAD staff may request voluntary transfers
and the IAD Commander makes every effort to accommodate such requests as soon as
possible in light of the operational needs of the Division and the Department (compliance
standard: Yes/No).
• Task 1.3: Training and qualifications of members and other personnel in IAD are
consistent with the IAD manual (compliance standard: 90%)
• Task 1.4: Confidential information is maintained in accordance with the IAD manual
(compliance standard: Yes/No).
We conducted this audit to follow up on the nineteenth reporting period, when OIG’s external
consultant found OPD not in compliance with Task 1. At that time, the external consultant
noted, among other issues, that several IAD personnel files were incomplete, IAD case files were
not all stored properly, and the Department did not sufficiently review the report-writing and
investigative skills of prospective IAD employees.
To assess Task 1, we interviewed the IAD commander and reviewed training records for all 30
personnel currently assigned to IAD.
IAD recently experienced a leadership transition, when the former IAD commander was
promoted to Deputy Chief and a new commander who had significant experience in IAD was
assigned. Before this transition, the current and former IAD commanders met to discuss the
requirements of Task 1 and the results of OIG’s recent audit. They also reviewed the existing
Task 1 folders for current IAD personnel. The current IAD commander indicated that her prior
experience in IAD enhanced her career development – both with respect to her promotion and