68,465 docs · 699,649 pages · 89,092 facts · as of 2026-07-30

Record D-4114 · nsa_report

21st-quarterly-report.pdf

oaklandca · 1.1 MB · 89 pages extracted · 65 facts cite this document · retrieved 2026-07-15 · original location · open the PDF

Figures extracted from this document

NSA Task 1 compliance status0compliance_status2015-05-04p.86
NSA Task 13 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.88
NSA Task 16 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.29
NSA Task 18 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.31
NSA Task 2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.11
NSA Task 2.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.10
NSA Task 2.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.10
NSA Task 2.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.11
NSA Task 20 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.34
NSA Task 20.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.32
NSA Task 20.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.33
NSA Task 20.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.33
NSA Task 20.5 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.34
NSA Task 20.6 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.34
NSA Task 24 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.38
NSA Task 24.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.36
NSA Task 24.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 24.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 24.4 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 24.9 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 25 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.42
NSA Task 25.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.40
NSA Task 25.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.41
NSA Task 25.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.41
NSA Task 25.4 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.41
NSA Task 25.5 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.42
NSA Task 25.6 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.42
NSA Task 26 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.45
NSA Task 26.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.44
NSA Task 3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.13
NSA Task 30 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.46
NSA Task 33 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.49
NSA Task 34 compliance status0.5compliance_status2015-05-04p.56
NSA Task 34.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.50
NSA Task 34.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.51
NSA Task 34.3 compliance status0.5compliance_status2015-05-04p.55
NSA Task 35 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.57
NSA Task 35.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.57
NSA Task 35.4 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.57
NSA Task 37 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.59

…and 25 more in the API.

Extracted text

· page 88 of 89 · · see this page in the PDF

Twenty-First Quarterly Report of the Independent Monitor for the Oakland Police Department May 4, 2015 Page 87 compliance since compliance is sent via email. Final information – including declarations, research notes, discovery granted at in-chambers review, emails, and compliance – are scanned and saved to the IAD server. OPD is in compliance with Task 13. Use of Force Reporting Review During this reporting period, we reviewed the use of force reporting review recently conducted by OIG to determine if OPD members were properly reporting uses of force relating to arrests. OIG selected a random sample of 50 felony incidents due to their potential for a reportable use of force when apprehending a suspect for review. OIG examined all associated crime and supplemental reports, PDRD footage, and use of force reports, to identify all uses of force and verify that each had been properly reported in accordance with OPD policy. OIG determined that each use of force was properly reported; however, in nine reports, OIG noted ancillary issues that required corrective action by OPD supervisory personnel. In seven of the nine reports, officers failed to activate their PDRDs when required. The other two reports involved tactical issues that created officer safety concerns in potentially lethal situations. OIG also reviewed use of force complaints from the same time period to determine if IAD had found any instances of officers failing to report their use of force. In only one of the 68 applicable cases, the investigation found that an officer failed to report a use of force – an off- duty instance of intentional pointing of a firearm. For this violation, the officer was sustained.