68,465 docs · 699,649 pages · 89,092 facts · as of 2026-07-30

Record D-4175 · nsa_report

fourteenth-report.pdf

oaklandca · 0.5 MB · 113 pages extracted · 42 facts cite this document · retrieved 2026-07-15 · original location · open the PDF

Figures extracted from this document

NSA Task 1 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.23
NSA Task 11 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.40
NSA Task 13 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.41
NSA Task 14 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.42
NSA Task 15 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.44
NSA Task 16 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.46
NSA Task 18 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.48
NSA Task 19 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.50
NSA Task 2 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.25
NSA Task 20 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.51
NSA Task 21 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.53
NSA Task 23 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.55
NSA Task 25 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.64
NSA Task 27 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.67
NSA Task 28 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.69
NSA Task 29 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.70
NSA Task 3 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.27
NSA Task 31 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.73
NSA Task 33 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.77
NSA Task 34 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.79
NSA Task 36 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.82
NSA Task 37 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.83
NSA Task 38 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.85
NSA Task 4 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.29
NSA Task 40 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.90
NSA Task 43 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.96
NSA Task 44 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.99
NSA Task 45 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.102
NSA Task 46 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.105
NSA Task 47 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.107
NSA Task 48 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.107
NSA Task 49 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.109
NSA Task 5 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.32
NSA Task 50 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.110
NSA Task 51 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.111
NSA Task 51.2 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.112
NSA Task 6 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.33
NSA Task 8 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.36
NSA Task 9 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.37
NSA tasks in compliance32tasks_of_512010-01-13p.20

…and 2 more in the API.

Extracted text

· page 27 of 113 · · see this page in the PDF

Independent Monitoring Team Fourteenth Status Report of the Independent Monitor Delphine Allen, et al., v. City of Oakland, et al. July 31, 2009 to January 13, 2010 Page 22 The Department’s reasons for not conducting any repeated allegations integrity tests include staffing and logistical challenges. As discussed in our audit report, however, the lack of such testing also indicates a failure by the agency to adequately train responsible personnel regarding conducting integrity tests. This failure is discouraging, given that such testing is not only mandated by the NSA, but also has the potential to reap significant risk management rewards, and may save officers’ careers. On a more positive note, our review found that, as the NSA requires, OPD conducted its selective integrity tests in accordance with the parameters IAD has established. We generally found that the conduct and documentation of these tests was good and had improved since our previous review. Well-conceived and focused integrity testing can allow OPD to use its resources more efficiently. Such testing also has the potential to prove to OPD personnel and the community that the Department is capable of policing itself in a fair and proactive manner. We encourage OPD to develop an effective system for conducting integrity checks of officers repeatedly alleged to have committed misconduct. OPD is not in compliance with Task 3. This task will be actively monitored under the MOU. The Monitor will conduct the required audits, reviews, or studies to assess whether OPD is complying with the substantive task requirements. (MOU, paragraph 10.) 4. Complaint Control System for IAD and Informal Complaint Resolution Process (Task 4; S.A. III.D.) a. Settlement Agreement Requirements • By June 15, 2004, OPD must develop a policy regarding an informal complaint resolution process to be used by supervisors and IAD to resolve eligible complaints. The Settlement Agreement sets forth certain criteria that must be included in this informal complaint resolution process. • By October 1, 2004, OPD must implement this informal complaint resolution process. • By June 15, 2004, OPD must develop a policy establishing a central control system for complaints and Departmental requests to open investigations. The Settlement Agreement sets forth certain criteria that must be included in this central control system. • By October 1, 2004, OPD must implement this central control system.