fourteenth-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Independent Monitoring Team
Fourteenth Status Report of the Independent Monitor
Delphine Allen, et al., v. City of Oakland, et al.
July 31, 2009 to January 13, 2010
Page 41
OPD is not in compliance with Task 16. This task will be actively monitored under the
MOU. The Monitor will conduct the required audits, reviews or studies to assess whether OPD
is complying with the substantive task requirements. (MOU, paragraph 10.)
17.
Audit, Review and Evaluation of IAD Functions (Task 17; S.A. III.P.)
a.
Settlement Agreement Requirements
• OPD and the Monitor shall conduct audits, reviews and
evaluations of IAD functions, as specified in the Settlement
Agreement.
b.
Status of Compliance and Assessment
Task 17 has no separate requirements. Task 17 reiterates Task 51, which requires OPD
to conduct several annual audits, including audits of IAD functions, and the duties of the
Monitor, reflected elsewhere in the Settlement Agreement. As discussed in our task update for
Task 51, OPD remains in compliance with this Settlement Agreement task. It has conducted
ongoing reviews and evaluations of IAD’s complaint intake and investigation functions,
including providing feedback to IAD regarding complaint quality and timeliness.
B.
Supervisory Span of Control and Unity of Command (Tasks 18–23; S.A. IV.)
Section IV of the Settlement Agreement, Tasks 18–23, requires a number of measures to
improve supervision of OPD officers and employees, particularly field supervision of OPD’s
patrol officers. In addition to the key requirement of a 1:8 supervisor to patrol officer ratio, this
section promotes more consistent supervision by requiring the assignment of a single supervisor
to each OPD member and employee. This section also requires mechanisms to improve the
detection and communication of problems or potential problems, including regular performance
review meetings and assignment of a liaison to the District Attorney’s and Public Defender’s
Offices.
Two of these tasks, Span of Control for Supervisors (Task 20) and OPD/DA Liaison
Commander (Task 22), were due during the first reporting period. During the third reporting
period, three additional tasks became due: Approval of Field-Arrest by Supervisor (Task 18);
Unity of Command (Task 19); and Command Staff Rotation (Task 23). During the fourth and
fifth reporting period, the final task in this section, Members’, Employees’, and Supervisors’
Performance Reviews (Task 21), became due.
OPD has achieved policy and training compliance for all six of the tasks in this area.
During the current reporting period, the IMT completed an actual practice compliance review for
Task 20.