ninth-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Independent Monitoring Team
Ninth Status Report of the Independent Monitor
Delphine Allen, et al., v. City of Oakland, et al.
May 13, 2006, to November 30, 2006
Page 8
Department has stated that it is committed to maintaining the advances it has made in its
Field Training Program, and ensuring that its new officers receive appropriate field
training.
IV.
COMPLIANCE OVERVIEW
Our discussion of OPD’s compliance efforts and status is organized around the 12
Settlement Agreement sections from which OPD derived 51 “tasks.” At the start of the
monitoring process, the IMT reviewed OPD’s task designations, found the task division
to be workable, and in the interests of clarity and consistency, adopted the same
designations.1
The 12 Settlement Agreement areas around which we organize our report are:
1) Internal Affairs Division; 2) Supervisory Span of Control and Unity of Command;
3) Use of Force Reporting; 4) Reporting Procedures; 5) Personnel Assessment System
(PAS); 6) Field Training Officer Program; 7) Academy and In-Service Training;
8) Personnel Practices; 9) Community Policing Plan; 10) Departmental Management and
Annual Management Report; 11) Independent Monitoring; and 12) Compliance Unit.
As of the last reporting period, all 51 Settlement Agreement tasks became due.
As noted in our previous reports, OPD must complete each of three steps (policy,
training, and actual practice) to achieve compliance with a Settlement Agreement
requirement. The following chart lists the 51 tasks with their due dates and summarizes
the current state of compliance:
Actual Practice
Compliance**
Task
Task Name
Due Date
Compliant
Policy
Training
Compliance
Partial
Compliance
Full
Compliance
1
IAD Staffing and
Resources
8/13/2004
√
√
√(c)
(11/06) *
2
Timeliness Standards
and Compliance with
IAD Investigations
6/15/2004
√
√
√
1 Section XV of the Settlement Agreement imposes additional obligations on the parties (e.g. semi-annual
status reports to the Court and meet-and-confer obligations). Because the IMT agrees with OPD that there
is no need to “task” these obligations, they are not included in the description of compliance efforts and
status. Nevertheless, failure to abide by these provisions would of course constitute a violation of the
Settlement Agreement.