ninth-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Independent Monitoring Team
Ninth Status Report of the Independent Monitor
Delphine Allen, et al., v. City of Oakland, et al.
May 13, 2006, to November 30, 2006
Page 26
They do not include investigative reports and often do not include interviews of the
subject officer. The Settlement Agreement requires that the subject officer be
interviewed, and our review indicates that this interview is often necessary to adequately
investigate a complaint. OPD recognizes that cases resolved via "Summary Finding," do
not comply with all NSA requirements and is seeking to have those requirements
changed, because, in OPD’s view, cases resolved via Summary Finding are still thorough
investigations, reduce IAD workload, and provide quicker resolution to investigations, a
benefit to both officers and complainants. In our judgment, Summary Findings, as
currently defined by OPD, are not appropriate for resolving the majority of internal
investigations. However, we do not object to their use in some instances, provided that
the Settlement Agreement is revised so that their use is consistent with it.
OPD is in compliance with the requirement that it maintain a process for
informally resolving Class II misconduct allegations. It has almost attained compliance
with the requirement that complaints that are informally resolved include certain
documented information. Ninety percent of the informally resolved complaints reviewed
included the required information.
In addition, OPD is in compliance with the requirements that formal complaints
be initiated when the informal complaint process is not successful and that it not unduly
influence individuals to participate in the informal complaint process.
During the upcoming reporting periods, the IMT will determine whether OPD’s
actual practices fully comply with this Settlement Agreement provision.
5.
Complaint Procedures for IAD (Task 5; S.A. III.E.)
a.
Settlement Agreement Requirements
• By June 15, 2004, OPD must develop a policy to
provide immediate access to a supervisor to all citizens
seeking to file a complaint. The Settlement Agreement
sets forth certain criteria to be followed if there is delay
greater than three hours in providing access to a
supervisor or if the complainant refuses to travel to or
wait for a supervisor.
• By June 15, 2004, OPD must develop a policy to
provide Oakland City Jail inmates the opportunity to
file a complaint against OPD officers/employees. The
Settlement Agreement sets forth certain criteria that
must be included in this policy.
• By June 15, 2004, OPD must develop policies setting
standards for IAD investigations and dispositions of
citizen complaints, including that: OPD must consider