combined-10th-11th-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
| NSA Task 12 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.49 |
| NSA Task 2.1 compliance status | 0 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.34 |
| NSA Task 25 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 25.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.61 |
| NSA Task 26.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.62 |
| NSA Task 31.3 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.69 |
| NSA Task 35 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 35.4 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.74 |
| NSA Task 48.1 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.87 |
| NSA Task 48.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.88 |
Extracted text
Negotiated Settlement Agreement, Combined Tenth and Eleventh Semi-Annual Report
December 2008
e “By August 13, 2004, OPD must revise certain policies and procedures related to [AD
investigations and create an IAD procedural manual for conducting complaint
investigations.” (This requirement applies to Tasks 1-16 and is reiterated in Task 10.)
e “By August 13, 2004, OPD must train all personnel to ensure they have received,
understand and comply with new and revised Departmental policies and procedures.”
(This requirement applies to Tasks 1-16 and is reiterated in Task 10.)
e “By August 13, 2004, the IAD procedural manual must address: assignment and rotation
of officers; training and qualifications of members and other personnel in IAD;
appropriate background checks of IAD personnel; and confidentiality of IAD
information.”
Status: In Policy and Training Compliance
Deliverables
Information Bulletin, Preliminary Complaint Investigation Procedures
e Revised Departmental General Order M-3, Complaints Against Department Personnel or
Procedures (Rev. 15 Feb 08)
« Special Order 8553, TB V-T.1, Internal Investigations Procedure Manual
OIG Audit Summary
In May of 2007, the OIG initiated a review to determine if OPD is complying with Task 5 of the
Agreement. Only five requirements of Task 5 were assessed, Tasks 5.15, 5.16, 5.18, 5.19, and
5.21. OIG found the Department in compliance with two of the five reviewed Task 5
requirements, including:
e Ensuring each allegation in a complaint is resolved by making one of the following
dispositions: Unfounded, Sustained, Exonerated, Not Sustained, or Filed;
¢ Ensuring every member or employee who is the subject of an internal investigation, as
well as any other member or employee on the scene of an incident at which misconduct
has been alleged by a complainant, is interviewed;
Although the review indicated that OPD has greatly improved in executing the directives in the
Agreement, it also found that the Department has not yet achieved full compliance with Task 5.
To be in compliance with these tasks, the Department must continue to do well in the areas
mentioned above and improve in the following areas:
e Gathering and documenting all relevant evidence, including circumstantial, direct and
physical evidence, and making credibility determinations, if feasible.
¢ Making efforts to resolve, by reference to physical evidence, and or use of follow-up
interviews and or other objective indicators, any inconsistent statements among
witnesses.
¢ Documenting analysis of the evidence supporting a finding for each allegation in a
complaint investigation, ensuring the “preponderance of the evidence” standard is met.
Even though full compliance with Task 5 has not yet been attained, IAD has greatly improved
the quality of its investigations.
35