combined-10th-11th-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
| NSA Task 12 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.49 |
| NSA Task 2.1 compliance status | 0 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.34 |
| NSA Task 25 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 25.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.61 |
| NSA Task 26.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.62 |
| NSA Task 31.3 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.69 |
| NSA Task 35 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 35.4 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.74 |
| NSA Task 48.1 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.87 |
| NSA Task 48.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.88 |
Extracted text
Negotiated Settlement Agreement, Combined Tenth and Eleventh Semi-Annual Report
December 2008
Brochures, was not assessed since the IMT conducted an audit of this task in Ji uly 2007 and
found the OPD to be in compliance.
OIG’s audit of Task 7 indicated that the Department was in compliance with six of the six
requirements that were assessed.
1. Task 7.1—The Department maintained its complaint line and ensured that it was staffed
by Departmental personnel. All calls placed were received by Department personnel.
2. Task 7.2—The Department successfully posted its Public Notice entitled Your Guide to
Filing A Complaint Against the Police in seven of the eight locations required by Internal
Affairs Division (IAD) Policy and Procedures 05-01. The one location that did not have
the guidelines posted was the Oakland Coliseum, which is not a City of Oakland facility.
However, at all of the eight locations, complaint forms and brochures were available by
request or on display.
3. Task 7.4—All members interviewed had complaint forms and informational brochures
available either in their vehicles or on their persons.
4, Task 7.6—The IAD continued to maintain its dedicated facility removed from the Police
Administration Building.
5. Task 7.7—The Department had both complaint forms and informational brochures
translated into Spanish, Chinese, and Vietnamese, in accordance with City policy.
6. Task 7.8—Complaint forms continued to be processed in accordance with controlling
state law.
The Department has made significant progress in complying with the mandates of Task 7 as
evidenced by the improvements it has made since the IMT’s audit of Task 7 during the ninth
reporting period (January 2007).
Task 08: Classifications of Citizen Complaints
¢ Settlement Agreement Section III. H; page 12, line 8 — page 13, line 12 (lead-in page 6, line
24 — page 7, line 2)
e Assigned Unit: IAD
Settlement Agreement Language
e “By June 15, 2004, OPD must, based on contemporary police standards and best
practices, develop a policy establishing a classification system for citizen complaints. The
Settlement Agreement calls for complaints to be divided into two categories (Class I and
Class II) according to the severity of the offense.”
¢ “By October 1, 2004, OPD must implement this classification system.”
Status: In Policy, Training, and Partial Practice Compliance
38