68,465 docs · 699,649 pages · 89,092 facts · as of 2026-07-30

Record D-4226 · nsa_report

combined-10th-11th-report.pdf

oaklandca · 3.7 MB · 94 pages extracted · 10 facts cite this document · retrieved 2026-07-15 · original location · open the PDF

Figures extracted from this document

NSA Task 12 compliance status0.5compliance_status2008-12-17p.49
NSA Task 2.1 compliance status0compliance_status2008-12-17p.34
NSA Task 25 compliance status0.5compliance_status2008-12-17p.18
NSA Task 25.2 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.61
NSA Task 26.2 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.62
NSA Task 31.3 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.69
NSA Task 35 compliance status0.5compliance_status2008-12-17p.18
NSA Task 35.4 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.74
NSA Task 48.1 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.87
NSA Task 48.2 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.88

Extracted text

· page 45 of 94 · · see this page in the PDF

Negotiated Settlement Agreement, Combined Tenth and Eleventh Semi-Annual Report December 2008 Brochures, was not assessed since the IMT conducted an audit of this task in Ji uly 2007 and found the OPD to be in compliance. OIG’s audit of Task 7 indicated that the Department was in compliance with six of the six requirements that were assessed. 1. Task 7.1—The Department maintained its complaint line and ensured that it was staffed by Departmental personnel. All calls placed were received by Department personnel. 2. Task 7.2—The Department successfully posted its Public Notice entitled Your Guide to Filing A Complaint Against the Police in seven of the eight locations required by Internal Affairs Division (IAD) Policy and Procedures 05-01. The one location that did not have the guidelines posted was the Oakland Coliseum, which is not a City of Oakland facility. However, at all of the eight locations, complaint forms and brochures were available by request or on display. 3. Task 7.4—All members interviewed had complaint forms and informational brochures available either in their vehicles or on their persons. 4, Task 7.6—The IAD continued to maintain its dedicated facility removed from the Police Administration Building. 5. Task 7.7—The Department had both complaint forms and informational brochures translated into Spanish, Chinese, and Vietnamese, in accordance with City policy. 6. Task 7.8—Complaint forms continued to be processed in accordance with controlling state law. The Department has made significant progress in complying with the mandates of Task 7 as evidenced by the improvements it has made since the IMT’s audit of Task 7 during the ninth reporting period (January 2007). Task 08: Classifications of Citizen Complaints ¢ Settlement Agreement Section III. H; page 12, line 8 — page 13, line 12 (lead-in page 6, line 24 — page 7, line 2) e Assigned Unit: IAD Settlement Agreement Language e “By June 15, 2004, OPD must, based on contemporary police standards and best practices, develop a policy establishing a classification system for citizen complaints. The Settlement Agreement calls for complaints to be divided into two categories (Class I and Class II) according to the severity of the offense.” ¢ “By October 1, 2004, OPD must implement this classification system.” Status: In Policy, Training, and Partial Practice Compliance 38