combined-10th-11th-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
| NSA Task 12 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.49 |
| NSA Task 2.1 compliance status | 0 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.34 |
| NSA Task 25 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 25.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.61 |
| NSA Task 26.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.62 |
| NSA Task 31.3 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.69 |
| NSA Task 35 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 35.4 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.74 |
| NSA Task 48.1 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.87 |
| NSA Task 48.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.88 |
Extracted text
Negotiated Settlement Agreement, Combined Tenth and Eleventh Semi-Annual Report
December 2008,
OIG Audit Summary
On February 29, 2008, OIG initiated an audit to determine if OPD is complying with Task 11 of
the Agreement, Task 11, Summary of Citizen Complaints Provided to OPD Personnel, requires
that an investigator of a citizen complaint provide a brief synopsis of the complaint alleged
against an OPD member/employee to that member/employee. A copy of the synopsis is to be
maintained in the IAD investigation file and the subject Member/Employee’s immediate chain of
command is to be notified of the allegation and investigation. In addition, the subject
member/employee is not allowed to read the complaint itself or to review citizen statements or
other statements prior to the member’s/employee’s interview.
The OIG audit revealed that OPD was in compliance with Task 11. Sixty internal investigations
were examined for the audit of Task 11. Of the 60 investigations reviewed, 52 (87%) of the
investigations properly documented that the subject member/employee was provided a synopsis
of the citizen complaint and a copy of that synopsis was included in the IAD investigation file,
and 51 (85%) properly documented that the subject member/employee’s immediate chain of
command was notified of the allegation and investigation.
Task 12: Disclosure of Possible Investigator Bias
¢ Settlement Agreement Section III. K; page 14, lines 1-11 (lead-in page 6, line 24 — page 7,
line 2)
e Assigned Unit: IAD
Settlement Agreement Language
“By June 15, 2004, OPD must develop and, by October 1, 2004, implement, a policy requiring
that investigators (IAD and field) disclose relationships that might lead to a perception of bias
regarding the subject(s) of any investigation, including family relationships, outside business
relationships, romantic relationships and close work or personal friendships. The Settlement
Agreement sets forth certain criteria regarding when and how investigators and their supervisors
must act on these disclosures.”
Status: In Policy and Training Compliance
Deliverables
e Revised Departmental General Order M-3, Complaints Against Department Personnel or
Procedures
e Special Order 8553, TB V-T.1, /nternal Investigations Procedure Manual
OIG Audit Summary
On February 29, 2008, OIG initiated an audit to determine if OPD is complying with Task 12 of
the Agreement. Task 12, Disclosure of Possible Investigator Bias, requires investigators to
disclose relationships that might lead to the perception of bias regarding the subject(s) of any
investigation. In cases where it is clear that the nature of the relationship could be perceived to
compromise the investigative process, the investigator(s) shall recuse him/herself from the
investigation.
41