68,465 docs · 699,649 pages · 89,092 facts · as of 2026-07-30

Record D-4226 · nsa_report

combined-10th-11th-report.pdf

oaklandca · 3.7 MB · 94 pages extracted · 10 facts cite this document · retrieved 2026-07-15 · original location · open the PDF

Figures extracted from this document

NSA Task 12 compliance status0.5compliance_status2008-12-17p.49
NSA Task 2.1 compliance status0compliance_status2008-12-17p.34
NSA Task 25 compliance status0.5compliance_status2008-12-17p.18
NSA Task 25.2 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.61
NSA Task 26.2 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.62
NSA Task 31.3 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.69
NSA Task 35 compliance status0.5compliance_status2008-12-17p.18
NSA Task 35.4 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.74
NSA Task 48.1 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.87
NSA Task 48.2 compliance status1compliance_status2008-12-17p.88

Extracted text

· page 51 of 94 · · see this page in the PDF

Negotiated Settlement Agreement, Combined Tenth and Eleventh Semi-Annual Report December 2008 Deliverables ¢ Revised Departmental General Order M-3, Complaints Against Department Personnel or Procedures ¢ The Departmental Discipline Policy Manual (including the Discipline Matrix) e Special Order 8552, Summary Findings ¢ Special Order 8553, TB V-T.1, Internal Investigations Procedure Manual Task 16: Supporting IAD Process — Supervisor/Managerial Accountability ¢ Settlement Agreement Section III. O.; page 15, lines 5-11 (lead-in page 6, line 24 ~ page 7, line 2) ¢ Assigned Unit: IAD Settlement Agreement Language ¢ “By June 15, 2004, OPD must, based on contemporary police standards and best practices, develop a policy that holds supervisors and commanders, as well as other managers in the chain of command, accountable for supporting the IAD process. Where an IAD investigation finds that a supervisor or manager should have reasonably determined that a member/employee committed a Class I offense, that supervisor or manager must be held accountable, through the Department’s administrative discipline process, for failure to supervise, failure to review and/or failure to intervene.” e “By October 1, 2004, OPD must implement this policy.” Status: In Policy and Training Compliance Deliverables ¢ Revised Departmental General Order M-3, Complaints Against Department Personnel or Procedures e Special Order 8553, TB V-T.1, Internal Investigations Procedure Manual Task 17: Audit, Review and Evaluation of IAD Functions ¢ Settlement Agreement Section IV; page 15, lines 15-18 e Assigned Unit: N/A Settlement Agreement Language “By January 20, 2004, OPD must develop and implement, based on contemporary police standards and best practices, policies to address certain standards and provisions (set forth in section IV, paragraphs A-F) related to Supervisory Span of Control and Unity of Command.”