combined-10th-11th-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
| NSA Task 12 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.49 |
| NSA Task 2.1 compliance status | 0 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.34 |
| NSA Task 25 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 25.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.61 |
| NSA Task 26.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.62 |
| NSA Task 31.3 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.69 |
| NSA Task 35 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 35.4 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.74 |
| NSA Task 48.1 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.87 |
| NSA Task 48.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.88 |
Extracted text
Negotiated Settlement Agreement, Combined Tenth and Eleventh Semi-Annual Report
December 2008
SUPERVISORY SPAN OF CONTROL AND UNITY OF
COMMAND
Task 18: Approval of Field-Arrest by Supervisor
* Settlement Agreement Section IV. A.; page 15, line 19 — page 16, line 5 (lead-in page 15,
lines 16-18)
e Assigned Unit: BFO
Settlement Agreement Language
“By January 20, 2004, OPD must develop and implement a policy requiring the approval of
field-arrests by a supervisor in most cases. This policy necessitates that OPD develop standards
for field supervisors that encourage or mandate close and frequent supervisory contacts with
subordinates. The Settlement Agreement sets forth certain criteria regarding supervisor review of
field-arrests, including that, under ordinary circumstances, supervisors respond to the scenes of
field arrests for felonies; narcotics-related possessory offenses; situations where there is an
investigated use of force; and arrests for obstructing, resisting, or assaulting an officer.”
Status: In Policy, Training, and Conditional Practice Compliance
Conditional Practice Compliance: The IMT found the Department in conditional compliance
with actual practice in June 2007.
Deliverables
¢ Revised Departmental General Order M-18, Arrest Approval and Report Review in the
Field
e SO 8257, Supervisors Approval of Arrest
IMT Audit Summary
During the last reporting period, the IMT conducted its second audit of actual practice
compliance with this task and found that OPD had made significant progress in ensuring that its
Supervisors respond to the scene of designated arrests and that required elements are reviewed
and documented sufficiently. The IMT found the Department in compliance with all
requirements of Task 18, with the exception of the witness identification requirement, which
they did not assess. The IMT will be assessing OPD’s compliance with the witness identification
requirement in an upcoming audit. If the police reports show that witness identification is not
occurring as required, OPD will fall out of full compliance with Task 18.
Task 19: Unity of Command
¢ Settlement Agreement Section IV. B; page 16, lines 6-10 (lead-in page 15, lines 16-18)
e Assigned Unit: BFO
Settlement Agreement Language
“By January 20, 2004, OPD must develop and implement a policy requiring that, with rare
exceptions justified on a case-by-case basis, each OPD member or employee has a single, clearly
46