combined-10th-11th-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
| NSA Task 12 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.49 |
| NSA Task 2.1 compliance status | 0 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.34 |
| NSA Task 25 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 25.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.61 |
| NSA Task 26.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.62 |
| NSA Task 31.3 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.69 |
| NSA Task 35 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 35.4 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.74 |
| NSA Task 48.1 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.87 |
| NSA Task 48.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.88 |
Extracted text
Negotiated Settlement Agreement, Combined Tenth and Eleventh Semi-Annual Report
December 2008
Settlement Agreement Language
“By August 14, 2003, OPD must, based on contemporary police standards and best practices,
develop and implement a policy to ensure appropriate supervision of its Area Command Field
Teams, The Settlement Agreement sets forth certain provisions that must be included in the
policy. Most notably, the Settlement Agreement requires that, under normal conditions, OPD
assign one primary sergeant to each Area Command Field Team. Additionally, a supervisor’s
span of control cannot exceed eight members.”
Status: In Policy and Training Compliance
Deliverables
e Assignment of one primary sergeant to each Area Command Field Team (under normal
conditions)
¢ A supervisory ratio not exceeding eight members to one Area Command Field Team
primary sergeant (with certain exceptions)
BFO Policy and Procedure 03-02, Supervisory Span of Control
e Bureau of Investigations (BOI) Policy and Procedures 04-02, Supervisory Span of
Control
Implementation Activities
The Department replaced BFO 03-02 and BOI 04-02 with DGO A-19, Supervisory Span of
Control. Additionally, Special Order 8435, Acting Sergeant Selection Process was published,
establishing procedures for ensuring that those individuals who serve as acting sergeants
Task 21: Members’, Employees’ and Supervisors’ Performance Review
¢ Settlement Agreement Section IV. D.; page 17, lines 2-19 (lead-in page 15, lines 16-18)
¢ Assigned Unit: BOS
Note: DGO B-6 is covered by and includes Tasks 21 and 44. Both of these Tasks share the same
deliverable.
Settlement Agreement Language
e “By May 5, 2004, OPD must, based on contemporary police standards and best practices,
develop and implement a member, employee and supervisor performance review policy.
The Settlement Agreement sets forth certain criteria that must be included in this policy.”
e “By July 7, 2004, OPD must hold its supervisors and commanders/managers responsible
for identifying patterns of improper behavior of their subordinates. Failure to identify
.Patterns and instances of misconduct when the supervisors or commanders/managers
knew or reasonably should have known of the misconduct shall constitute grounds for
discipline.”
e “By July 7, 2004, Bureau of Field Operations sergeants and lieutenants must scrutinize
arrests and uses of force that have been historically associated with police misconduct.”
Status: In Policy, Training, and Partial Practice Compliance
48