FY 2026-27 Proposed Midcycle Budget
City ResolutionFiled under council matter 26-0787
Subject: FY 2026-27 Proposed Midcycle Budget From: Finance Department Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution (1) Adopting The Midcycle Budget For Fiscal Years 2026-27 And Appropriating Funds And Revenues To Cover Expenditures Approved By Said Budget; And (2) Authorizing The City Admi
Extracted text
Elizabeth Lake, Acting City Administrator
Subject: FY 2026-27 Mayor’s Proposed Midcycle Budget
Date: June 5, 2026
Page 2
Special City Council
June 12, 2026
9. Suspending The Minimum Budget Set Asides For The Democracy Dollars Fund And
For Non-Staff Costs Related To The Public Ethics Commission’s Administration Of The
Oakland Fair Elections Act’s Democracy Dollars Program
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Mayor’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27 Proposed Policy Midcycle Budget was published on May
15, 2026. This report was written to provide the City Council with an overview of the proposed
one-year spending plan that the City Administrator will appropriate during FY 2026-27. The FY
2026-27 Proposed Midcycle Budget may be accessed through the City’s interactive online
budget book at www.oaklandca.gov/budget.
BACKGROUND / LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
Per Section 801 of the Oakland City Charter, the City Council is required to adopt a budget by
June 30 to authorize expenditures for the following fiscal year. If a budget is not adopted by
June 30, the appropriations of the previous fiscal year are deemed to be effective until the new
budget and appropriation measures are adopted
Attachment A to this report contains a PDF version of the FY 2026-27 Proposed Midcycle
Policy Budget. On June 1, 20206, the Mayor presented the proposed budget to the City Council
at a Special City Council meeting. Attachment B contains the presentation materials provided
to the City Council during that meeting.
ANALYSIS AND POLICY ALTERNATIVES
This proposed budget reflects the City’s efforts to sustain core services using currently available
resources while continuing to address Oakland’s long-term structural fiscal challenges. The cost
of providing services continues to rise faster than available revenues.
Across departments, budgets have been largely adjusted to minimum operating levels
necessary to continue core services. Personnel budgets have been aligned with current
projected staffing levels in the Police and Fire Department, while operations and maintenance,
and contract budgets have been reduced to support only essential and currently planned
activities. There is little remaining flexibility for new initiatives, service expansions or unforeseen
cost pressures.
Public Safety
This budget prioritizes core emergency response and violence prevention operations within
significant fiscal constraints. While the proposed budget preserves baseline police, fire,
dispatch and violence prevention operations, reductions to specialized enforcement activities
limit the City’s ability to sustain certain proactive public safety operations and intervention efforts
over time.