68,465 docs · 699,649 pages · 88,897 facts · as of 2026-07-30

Record D-4114 · nsa_report

21st-quarterly-report.pdf

oaklandca · 1.1 MB · 89 pages extracted · 65 facts cite this document · retrieved 2026-07-15 · original location · open the PDF

Figures extracted from this document

NSA Task 1 compliance status0compliance_status2015-05-04p.86
NSA Task 13 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.88
NSA Task 16 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.29
NSA Task 18 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.31
NSA Task 2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.11
NSA Task 2.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.10
NSA Task 2.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.10
NSA Task 2.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.11
NSA Task 20 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.34
NSA Task 20.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.32
NSA Task 20.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.33
NSA Task 20.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.33
NSA Task 20.5 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.34
NSA Task 20.6 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.34
NSA Task 24 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.38
NSA Task 24.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.36
NSA Task 24.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 24.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 24.4 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 24.9 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 25 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.42
NSA Task 25.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.40
NSA Task 25.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.41
NSA Task 25.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.41
NSA Task 25.4 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.41
NSA Task 25.5 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.42
NSA Task 25.6 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.42
NSA Task 26 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.45
NSA Task 26.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.44
NSA Task 3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.13
NSA Task 30 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.46
NSA Task 33 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.49
NSA Task 34 compliance status0.5compliance_status2015-05-04p.56
NSA Task 34.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.50
NSA Task 34.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.51
NSA Task 34.3 compliance status0.5compliance_status2015-05-04p.55
NSA Task 35 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.57
NSA Task 35.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.57
NSA Task 35.4 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.57
NSA Task 37 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.59

…and 25 more in the API.

Extracted text

· page 69 of 89 · · see this page in the PDF

Twenty-First Quarterly Report of the Independent Monitor for the Oakland Police Department May 4, 2015 Page 68 The value of the data in the chart below is in tracking data over time, and using it to increase the rigors of the review process as it serves the goal of risk reduction. For our quarterly reports, we also review the PAS histories of officers who had a Level 1 use of force. For this quarter, as was true last quarter, no officers fell into these categories. The development work on IPAS2 is continuing and the consulting firm is again available to manage the process in an efficient and effective manner. The system vendor has indicated that an 11-month turnaround time on the project should be expected, beginning soon, now that the scope of work is agreed upon and the contract finalized. A matrix of specific tasks has been added to the scope of work to complete the planning process. Given the importance of this project we will continue to review progress on the new system with a particular interest in the Department’s consideration of how the system will be used, as noted above. PAS Reviews Completed Supervisor Rec- no action % Recognition % Supervisor Rec - Monitoring % Supervisor Rec- Intervention % Supervisor concurs with PAS Admin % Commander rec Concurs w Supervisor % Dep. Chief Concurs w Commander % PAS Panel Concurs w DC % Pending Number of personnel that exceeded a threshold 2013 January 27 19 70% 1 4% 7 26% 0 0% 27 100% 27 100% 24 89% 5 14 February 13 13 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 9 69% 8 62% 10 77% 5 7 March 10 10 100% 0 0% 1 10% 0 0% 10 100% 10 100% 6 60% 6 11 April 10 10 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 10 100% 10 100% 9 90% 2 4 May 14 8 57% 2 14% 2 14% 2 14% 14 100% 13 93% 12 86% 8 18 June 11 10 91% 0 0% 1 9% 0 0% 11 100% 10 91% 8 73% 1 4 July 4 2 50% 0 0% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100% 4 100% 4 100% 2 12 August 9 6 67% 0 0% 3 33% 0 0% 7 78% 8 89% 7 78% 1 12 September 8 7 88% 0 0% 0 0% 1 13% 8 100% 8 100% 7 88% 0 0 October 2 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100% 2 100% 2 100% 0 0 November 2 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100% 2 100% 1 50% 5 11 December 7 6 86% 0 0% 1 14% 0 0% 7 100% 7 100% 7 100% 4 15 Total 117 94 3 1% 16 4 111 109 97 39 108 Average 9.8 7.8 83% 0.3 1% 1.3 11% 0.3 4% 9.3 96% 9.1 95% 8.1 82% 3.3 9.0 2014 January 3 2 67% 0 0% 1 33% 0 0% 3 100% 3 100% 3 100% 2 67% 5 18 February 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 March 7 4 57% 0 0% 2 29% 1 14% 7 100% 7 100% 7 100% 7 100% 8 11 April 20 18 90% 0 0% 1 5% 1 5% 15 75% 19 95% 19 95% 18 90% 0 14 May 9 6 67% 0 0% 3 0% 0 0% 9 100% 9 100% 8 89% 8 89% 0 1 June 10 9 90% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 8 80% 9 90% 9 90% 10 100% 19 14 July 9 8 89% 0 0% 1 11% 0 0% 9 100% 9 100% 9 100% 9 100% 20 17 August 9 7 78% 0 0% 2 22% 0 0% 9 100% 9 100% 9 100% 8 89% 16 1 September 3 3 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 67% 2 67% 3 100% 3 100% 33 22 October 17 13 76% 1 6% 3 18% 0 0% 14 82% 15 88% 15 88% 16 94% 4 0 November 3 3 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 100% 3 100% 3 100% 3 100% 32 14 December 15 13 87% 0 0% 2 13% 0 0% 14 93% 15 100% 15 100% 14 93% 23 3 Total 105 86 1 16 2 93 93 101 98 116 Running Average 11.7 9.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 10.3 0.0 11.2 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 12.9 Summary of PAS Reviews and Recommendations 1/13-12/14