combined-10th-11th-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
| Metric | Value | Unit | Period | Page |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSA Task 12 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.49 |
| NSA Task 2.1 compliance status | 0 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.34 |
| NSA Task 25 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 25.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.61 |
| NSA Task 26.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.62 |
| NSA Task 31.3 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.69 |
| NSA Task 35 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 35.4 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.74 |
| NSA Task 48.1 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.87 |
| NSA Task 48.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.88 |
Extracted text
Negotiated Settlement Agreement, Combined Tenth and Eleventh Semi-Annual Report
December 2008
" Quality Assurance Program feedback. The Investigations Section Lieutenant and
Administrative Sergeant provide valuable feedback to division level investigators,
discussing on-going investigative needs and concerns by way of face-to-face meetings,
telephone calls, and email exchanges. Formal written feedback is provided using an
investigative feedback form designed to help IAD identify where additional training or
personalized attention is needed.
= Provision of Investigative Plans. Each plan provides the division level investigator a
template upon which to build his/her investigation. The plan is developed by the
intake officer and further refined by the IAD Administration Section commander to
provide clear guidance to the investigator.
= Participation in Continuing Professional Training for sergeants. Sergeants are most
often assigned to conduct division level investigations. Proper training and updates
ensure that their investigations meet the same high standards as investigations
completed in IAD.
IAD is confident that its policies and systems, based on IAD staff institutional knowledge as well
as input from the IMT and the City Attorney’s office, will continue to improve and adapt to the
ever-changing law enforcement environment, well beyond the Agreement deadline of 2010.
While much of what IAD does on a daily basis is centered on compliance with the Agreement,
the division looks toward the future with an eye toward sustainability of best practices.
IAD Compliance Unit Efforts
The Compliance Unit is responsible for handling compliance with 21 of the I[AD-related
Agreement tasks and works with OIG, the City Attorney’s Office, and the IMT in order to ensure
that current policy complies with Agreement requirements. The Compliance Unit also revises
policy related to accepting, processing, and investigating complaints. The Unit also conducts
periodic reviews of the Department’s compliance with Agreement reforms in order to identify
and resolve performance deficiencies. The Compliance Unit is the Division’s liaison to the IMT
and routinely responds to requests for information from the IMT.
Other IAD Accomplishments
Several Department policies, including DGO M-3 (Complaints Against Departmental Personnel
or Procedures), DGO M-3.1 (Informal Compliant Resolution Process), and Training Bulletins
V-T (Discipline Policy) and V-T.1 (internal Investigation Procedures), were revised and several
stipulations to the Agreement were negotiated to reflect the mutually agreed upon “best practice”
of the Department. A new IAD Daily Incident Log was also developed to ensure compliance
with Task 5, Complaint Procedures for IAD, including those task requirements that were not
previously being tracked, and the IAD complaint line was redesigned to help ensure that no calls
go unanswered.
This reporting period, IAD investigators received training in the areas of Internal Affairs
investigations, interview techniques, sexual harassment/discrimination investigations, retaliation
allegations, and officer-involved shootings.