combined-10th-11th-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
| Metric | Value | Unit | Period | Page |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSA Task 12 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.49 |
| NSA Task 2.1 compliance status | 0 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.34 |
| NSA Task 25 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 25.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.61 |
| NSA Task 26.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.62 |
| NSA Task 31.3 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.69 |
| NSA Task 35 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 35.4 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.74 |
| NSA Task 48.1 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.87 |
| NSA Task 48.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.88 |
Extracted text
Negotiated Settlement Agreement, Combined Tenth and Eleventh Semi-Annual Report
December 2008
activities of Department personnel. The iPAS is used to assist supervisors in identifying
employees who need counseling, intervention, or remedial help as well as to recognize superior
performance. The Personnel Assessment System (PAS) Administration Unit uses the data
contained in iPAS to develop quarterly threshold reports that identify officers and employees
who may be exhibiting at-risk behaviors, poor performance, or exceptional positive activity. The
implementation of PAS has significantly increased the culture of accountability within the
Department. Supervisors, managers, and commanders cannot disavow knowledge of personnel
performance issues, as this data is made accessible to them for each of their subordinates. With
this information readily available, supervisors are better equipped to manage the performance of
their subordinates, commending when appropriate and taking effective corrective action when
necessary.
Accomplishments in Officer Supervision, Community Policing, and Crime Fighting
Efforts
Departmental accountability has been improved by implementing policies and procedures that
require supervisors to evaluate tactical decisions, identify training needs, and approve arrests in
the field, Supervisor span of control has been reduced to one sergeant for every eight officers,
permitting closer attention to squads. In January 2008, the Department reorganized its patrol
function to a geographic system of policing and began a new schedule (12 hour shifts) to
improve consistency of staffing and continuity of supervision.
The Department continues to increase community policing efforts. Personnel from the
Department’s Bureau of Field Operations attend quarterly meetings with community members at
local Neighborhood Crime Prevention Council meetings, allowing residents to get information
from the Department and help in identifying criminal and quality of life issues that are affecting
the community. Problem-Solving Officers (PSOs) continue to be a cornerstone of the
Department’s community policing efforts, working daily with community members on projects
they have deemed important in their respective neighborhoods. The Department has invested
heavily in the area of outreach, especially to local youth.
Improvements in Departmental Training
The Training Division is committed to providing high-quality, professional training to
Department personnel and ensuring that instruction is supportive of OPD’s values, ethics and
philosophy. The Training Division has implemented a mentoring program to assist Police
Officer Trainees in any issues that may arise during their training. It has also developed a better
evaluation process for grading instructors on the quality of their instruction. As a result of these
programs, a rigorous selection process, and the use of rubrics in the training and testing of
recruits, the Police Academy attrition rate has dropped 10% from the average rate of prior
Academies.
COMPLIANCE SUMMARY UPDATE
There are three phases of compliance: policy compliance, training compliance, and actual
practice compliance. Policy compliance is achieved when a policy regarding a specific task is
completed and approved by the IMT. Training compliance is achieved when the Department has
trained 95% of the required personnel and can document that achievement. Actual practice
3