combined-10th-11th-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
| Metric | Value | Unit | Period | Page |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSA Task 12 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.49 |
| NSA Task 2.1 compliance status | 0 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.34 |
| NSA Task 25 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 25.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.61 |
| NSA Task 26.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.62 |
| NSA Task 31.3 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.69 |
| NSA Task 35 compliance status | 0.5 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.18 |
| NSA Task 35.4 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.74 |
| NSA Task 48.1 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.87 |
| NSA Task 48.2 compliance status | 1 | compliance_status | 2008-12-17 | p.88 |
Extracted text
Negotiated Settlement Agreement, Combined Tenth and Eleventh Semi-Annual Report
December 2008
¢ Considering and documenting sustained and not sustained complaints against its
members/employees in their performance appraisals;
¢ Considering and documenting in the members’ performance appraisals their uses of
force; sick/injured leaves, arrests for narcotics-related possessory offenses not made as a
result of searches conducted pursuant to arrests for other offenses; arrests involving
charges of Penal Code §§69, 148 and/or 243(b)(c); and vehicle accidents;
e Ensuring its members/employees’ performance appraisals contain signatures, along with
the dates, from their respective supervisors/managers in the direct chain of command, up
to the Deputy Chief of the respective Bureau, when appropriate;
and
¢ Having the new supervisor of a promoted member/employee complete the
member/employee’s performance appraisal.
Although the audit indicated that OPD has improved in executing the directives in the
Agreement, the audit also found that the Department is still out of compliance with three
requirements of Task 44. One requirement could not be assessed. It will
be assessed as part of
Task 41 in future audits. To be in full compliance with this task, the Department must continue
to do well in the areas mentioned above and improve in the following areas.
e The Department should ensure that members/employees who ha’
duties (i.e., instructors, tactical team operations and support, tas!
outside of their normal assignments are rated on these duties.
¢ The Department should strive to track the movement of its mem!
ve significant collateral
force assignments, etc.)
bers/employees and to
know who their respective supervisors are during the year so that the supervisors can
provide input for the members/employees performance appraisals.
e The Department should document its efforts in building partnerships to fight crime in the
community it serves.
The Department revised DGO B-6 on May 26, 2006 to aid in its ability to comply with Task 44.
Although the DGO includes all the directives of Task 44, changes to the policy and the
performance appraisal form, specifically providing more clear instructions, may aid the
Department in achieving full compliance.
Task 45: Consistency-of-Discipline Pol
icy
« Settlement Agreement Section X. B; page 40, line 8 — page 41, line 3 (lead-in page 38, lines
21-22)
e Assigned Unit: IAD
77