Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting
Informational ReportFiled under council matter 12-0351
Subject: Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting From: City Administrator's Office Recommendation: Receive A Presentation And Hold Discussion On The Mayor's Proposed Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-2015
Extracted text
FILED
OFFICE OF THE C(7 Y CI ER>
OAKLAND
CITY OF OAKLAND
2013JUNIO PHl<:t»6
MEMORANDUM
TO:
HONORABLE MAYOR &
FROM: Jay Ashford
CITY COUNCIL
Chair, Budget Advisory Cmte.
SUBJECT:
Budget Advisory Committee's Response
DATE:
June 10, 2013
To the Mayor's proposed 2013-15 Budget
And the Suggested Councilmember Amendments
INFORMATION
At the BAC special meeting which took place June 6'^, 2013, the committee reached either
unanimous (or near-unanimous) consensus on the following items, regarding the proposed 2013-
15 budget. Ten of fifteen committee members were in attendance at this meeting.
BUDGETING PROCESS:
1. IMPROVED TRANSPARENCY AND INPUT: The BAC agreed that the budgeting
process during this cycle is to be commended for its openness, transparency, and for its
avenues for soliciting citizen input into the process. BAC members agreed that the
documentation and collateral distributed are improvements over prior years, and that the
town hall meetings were useful avenues for collecting citizen input.
2. PROFESSIONAL SURVEY: The BAC agrees that in future budgeting cycles, the City
should look to undertake a professional, scientific survey to collect greater citizen input
from those who are less likely to attend council meetings and budget workshops.
3
SEPARATE THE BUDGETING AND BARGAINING PROCESSES: The BAC
. agrees that the collective bargaining process and the budgeting process should take place
at different times during the year, to improve openness, stability and transparency. One
recommendation would be to engage in labor negotiations on a calendar year schedule,
while keeping budget negotiations on a fiscal year schedule.
REVENUES: .
4. ONE-TIME VS ONGOING REVENUES: The BAC agrees that the city should adhere
to its existing policy that expected one-time revenues be used only for one-time
expenditures, such as capital improvements, negative fund paydown, debt retirement, etc.