21st-quarterly-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Twenty-First Quarterly Report of the Independent Monitor
for the Oakland Police Department
May 4, 2015
Page 15
The administrative closures that we reviewed were investigated before IAD arrived at the
determination that such a closure comported with policy. Six allegations were classified as
service complaints, and all involved either slow response or no response to calls for service.
Four cases were administratively closed because they did not involve MOR violations. IAD
closed another complaint because the involved officer no longer worked for OPD.
The remaining allegations that were administratively closed comported with policy, in that the
complaints either lacked specificity, claimed innocence of charges best left to appropriate
adjudication venues to decide, or otherwise did not constitute MOR violations. Where they were
accompanied by allegations that warranted a full investigation, these additional allegations were
investigated in accordance with policy. We also identified several administrative closures in our
Task 7.3 (Anonymous Complaints) review, and they are further discussed in that section.
The cases resolved via summary finding were approved for such designation as required by
policy. In all of these cases, the interactions between officers and citizens were recorded on
PDRDs, negating the need to interview all of the involved officers. Summary findings are
further discussed in Task 5.
OPD is in compliance with Task 4.10.
OPD is in Phase 2 compliance with Task 4.
Compliance Status:
Phase 1: In compliance
Phase 2: In compliance
Task 5: Complaint Procedures for IAD
Requirements:
1.
On or before December 1, 2003, OPD shall develop a policy so that, OPD
personnel who become aware that a citizen wishes to file a complaint shall bring
such citizen immediately, or as soon as circumstances permit, to a supervisor or
IAD or summon a supervisor to the scene. If there is a delay of greater than three
(3) hours, the reason for such delay shall be documented by the person receiving
the complaint. In the event that such a complainant refuses to travel to a
supervisor or to wait for one, the member/employee involved shall make all
reasonable attempts to obtain identification, including address and phone
number, as well as a description of the allegedly wrongful conduct and offending
personnel, from the complainant and any witnesses. This information, as well as
a description of the complaint, shall immediately, or as soon as circumstances
permit, be documented on a Complaint Form and submitted to the immediate
supervisor or, in his/her absence, the appropriate Area Commander, and shall be