68,471 docs · 699,671 pages · 90,541 facts · as of 2026-07-31

Record D-4114 · nsa_report

21st-quarterly-report.pdf

oaklandca · 1.1 MB · 89 pages extracted · 65 facts cite this document · retrieved 2026-07-15 · original location · open the PDF

Figures extracted from this document

Figures extracted from this document
MetricValueUnitPeriodPage
NSA Task 1 compliance status0compliance_status2015-05-04p.86
NSA Task 13 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.88
NSA Task 16 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.29
NSA Task 18 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.31
NSA Task 2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.11
NSA Task 2.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.10
NSA Task 2.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.10
NSA Task 2.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.11
NSA Task 20 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.34
NSA Task 20.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.32
NSA Task 20.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.33
NSA Task 20.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.33
NSA Task 20.5 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.34
NSA Task 20.6 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.34
NSA Task 24 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.38
NSA Task 24.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.36
NSA Task 24.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 24.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 24.4 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 24.9 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.37
NSA Task 25 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.42
NSA Task 25.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.40
NSA Task 25.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.41
NSA Task 25.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.41
NSA Task 25.4 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.41
NSA Task 25.5 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.42
NSA Task 25.6 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.42
NSA Task 26 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.45
NSA Task 26.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.44
NSA Task 3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.13
NSA Task 30 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.46
NSA Task 33 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.49
NSA Task 34 compliance status0.5compliance_status2015-05-04p.56
NSA Task 34.1 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.50
NSA Task 34.2 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.51
NSA Task 34.3 compliance status0.5compliance_status2015-05-04p.55
NSA Task 35 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.57
NSA Task 35.3 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.57
NSA Task 35.4 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.57
NSA Task 37 compliance status1compliance_status2015-05-04p.59

…and 25 more in the API.

Extracted text

· page 39 of 89 · · see this page in the PDF

Twenty-First Quarterly Report of the Independent Monitor for the Oakland Police Department May 4, 2015 Page 38 3. Use of force investigations shall include a recommendation whether the use of force was objectively reasonable and within Department policy and training. The recommendation shall be based on the totality of the circumstances and shall consider, but is not limited to, the following factors: a. Whether the force used was pursuant to a legitimate law-enforcement objective; b. Whether the type and amount of force used was proportional to the resistance encountered and reasonably related to the objective the members/employees were attempting to achieve; c. Whether the member/employee used reasonable verbal means to attempt to resolve the situation without force, if time and circumstances permitted such attempts; d. Whether the force used was de-escalated or stopped reasonably when resistance decreased or stopped; 4. use of force reports shall be reviewed by the appropriate chain-of-review as defined by policy. The type of force used, the identity of the involved members, and the report preparer shall be the determining criteria for utilizing the appropriate chain-of- review. Reviewers may include, when appropriate, the chain-of-command of the involved personnel, the appropriate Area Commander on duty at the time the incident occurred, other designated Bureau of Field Operations commanders, and as necessary, the chain-of-command of the involved personnel up to the Division Commander or Deputy Chief/Director, and the Internal Affairs Division. Reviewers for Level 1-3 use of force investigations shall: a. Make a recommendation as to whether the use of force was in or out of policy, b. Order additional investigation and investigative resources when necessary, and c. Comment on any training issue(s) when appropriate. 5. Any recommendation that the use of force did not comply with Department policy shall result in the incident being referred to the Internal Affairs Division to conduct additional investigation/analysis, if necessary. 6. Members/employees involved in a use of force incident resulting in serious injury or death and/or an officer-involved shooting, shall be separated from each other as soon as practicable at the incident scene, and kept apart until they have completed their reports and been interviewed. (Negotiated Settlement Agreement V. B.)