21st-quarterly-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Twenty-First Quarterly Report of the Independent Monitor
for the Oakland Police Department
May 4, 2015
Page 5
Compliance Assessment Methodology
The body of this report is comprised of our assessments of compliance with the individual
requirements of the 22 active Tasks of the NSA. Each requirement is followed by information
about the compliance status of the requirement during our previous reporting period, a discussion
regarding our assessments and the current status of compliance, a summary notation of Phase 1
and Phase 2 compliance (see below), and our planned next steps in each area.
The Monitor’s primary responsibility is to determine the status of the Oakland Police
Department’s compliance with the requirements of the 22 active Tasks. To accomplish this, the
Monitoring Team makes quarterly visits to Oakland to meet with OPD’s Office of Inspector
General (OIG) and other Department personnel – at the Police Department, in the streets, or at
the office that we occupy when onsite in the City. We also observe Departmental practices;
review Department policies and procedures; collect and analyze data using appropriate sampling
and analytic procedures; and inform the Parties and, on a quarterly basis, the Court, with
information about the status of OPD’s compliance.
Our Team determines compliance through an examination of policies and implementation of
practices that are relevant to each of the active Tasks. First, we determine if the Department has
established an appropriate policy or set of procedures to support each requirement. Following
this, we determine if the Department has effectively implemented that policy.
Based on this process, we report the degree of compliance with requirements on two levels.
First, we report if the Department has met policy compliance. Compliance with policy
requirements is known as Phase 1 compliance, and the Department achieves it when it has
promulgated appropriate policies and trained relevant Department members or employees in
their content. Second, we report on the extent to which the Department has implemented the
required policies. Implementation-level compliance is reported as Phase 2 compliance. In
general, to achieve full compliance, the Department must achieve both Phase 1 and Phase 2
compliance; that is, an appropriate policy must be adopted, trained to, and operationally
implemented.
Our conclusions with regard to Phase 1 or Phase 2 compliance will fall into the following
categories:
• In compliance: This is reported when policy requirements are met (Phase 1) or effective
implementation of a requirement has been achieved (Phase 2).
• Partial compliance: This is reported when at least one, but not all, requirements of a
Task have achieved compliance, showing progress toward full compliance. Tasks will
remain in partial compliance as long as we determine there is continued progress toward
reaching substantial, or full, compliance.