19th-quarterly-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Nineteenth Quarterly Report of the Independent Monitor
for the Oakland Police Department
October 30, 2014
Page 15
demeanor by a dispatcher, the audio recording of the call was sufficient to determine the
appropriate finding. Summary findings are further discussed in Task 5.
OPD is in compliance with Task 4.10.
OPD is in Phase 2 compliance with Task 4.
Compliance Status:
Phase 1: In compliance
Phase 2: In compliance
Task 5: Complaint Procedures for IAD
Requirements:
1.
On or before December 1, 2003, OPD shall develop a policy so that, OPD
personnel who become aware that a citizen wishes to file a complaint shall bring
such citizen immediately, or as soon as circumstances permit, to a supervisor or
IAD or summon a supervisor to the scene. If there is a delay of greater than three
(3) hours, the reason for such delay shall be documented by the person receiving
the complaint. In the event that such a complainant refuses to travel to a
supervisor or to wait for one, the member/employee involved shall make all
reasonable attempts to obtain identification, including address and phone
number, as well as a description of the allegedly wrongful conduct and offending
personnel, from the complainant and any witnesses. This information, as well as
a description of the complaint, shall immediately, or as soon as circumstances
permit, be documented on a Complaint Form and submitted to the immediate
supervisor or, in his/her absence, the appropriate Area Commander, and shall be
treated as a complaint. The supervisor or appropriate Area Commander notified
of the complaint shall ensure the Communications Division is notified and
forward any pertinent documents to the IAD.
2.
An on-duty supervisor shall respond to take a complaint received from a jail
inmate taken into custody by OPD, who wishes to make a complaint of Class I
misconduct contemporaneous with the arrest. The supervisor shall ensure the
Communications Division is notified and forward any pertinent documents to the
IAD. All other misconduct complaints, by a jail inmate shall be handled in the
same manner as other civilian complaints.
3.
In each complaint investigation, OPD shall consider all relevant evidence,
including circumstantial, direct and physical evidence, and make credibility
determinations, if feasible. OPD shall make efforts to resolve, by reference to
physical evidence, and/or use of follow-up interviews and other objective
indicators, inconsistent statements among witnesses.
4.
OPD shall develop provisions for the permanent retention of all notes, generated