19th-quarterly-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Nineteenth Quarterly Report of the Independent Monitor
for the Oakland Police Department
October 30, 2014
Page 17
a.
An investigation that cannot be presently completed. A filed investigation
is not a final disposition, but an indication that a case is pending further
developments that will allow completion of the investigation.
b.
The IAD Commander shall review all filed cases quarterly to determine
whether the conditions that prevented investigation and final disposition
have changed and may direct the closure or continuation of the
investigation.
7.
Any member or employee who is a subject of an internal investigation, as well as
any other member or employee on the scene of an incident at which misconduct
has been alleged by a complainant, shall be interviewed and a recorded statement
taken. However, investigators, with the approval of an IAD Commander, are not
required to interview and/or take a recorded statement from a member or
employee who is the subject of a complaint or was on the scene of the incident
when additional information, beyond that already provided by the existing set of
facts and/or documentation, is not necessary to reach appropriate findings and
conclusions.
(Negotiated Settlement Agreement III. E.)
Discussion:
There are six Departmental policies that incorporate the requirements of Task 5: Department
General Order M-03, Complaints Against Department Personnel and Procedures (published
December 6, 2005 and revised most recently on August 22, 2013); Communications Division
Policy & Procedures C-02, Receiving and Logging Complaints Against Personnel and Use of
Force Incidents (published April 6, 2007); Training Bulletin V-T.1, Internal Investigation
Procedure Manual (published June 1, 2006); Special Order 8270, Booking of Prisoners at the
Glenn E. Dyer Detention Facility (published June 24, 2005); Special Order 8565, Complaints
Against Department Personnel (published May 11, 2007); and IAD Policy & Procedures 05-02,
IAD Investigation Process (published December 6, 2005). In addition, NSA stipulations issued
on December 12, 2005, and March 13, 2007, incorporate the requirements of this Task. As the
Department has trained at least 95% of relevant personnel on these policies, we find OPD in
continued Phase 1 compliance with this Task.
OPD has been in Phase 2 compliance with Task 5 since the fourteenth reporting period. In each
of the prior reporting periods, we found the Department in partial compliance with Task 5.7
To verify Phase 2 compliance with Tasks 5.1 through 5.5, we reviewed 91 entries that appeared
on the Daily Incident Logs (DILs) that were completed between April 1, and June 30, 2014. We
identified these by randomly selecting 48 dates during this reporting period and reviewing the
entries for each of those dates.
Task 5.1 requires that when a citizen wishes to file a complaint, the citizen is brought to a
supervisor or IAD, or a supervisor is summoned to the scene (compliance standard: 95%).
7 Pursuant to an agreement among the Parties, Tasks 5.7- 5.11, and 5.13-5.14 are not subject to active monitoring.