seventeenth-quarterly-report.pdf

oaklandca · 1.0 MB · 88 pages extracted · 63 facts cite this document · retrieved 2026-07-15 · original location · open the PDF

Figures extracted from this document

Figures extracted from this document
Metric	Value	Unit	Period	Page
NSA Task 12 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.85
NSA Task 14 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.86
NSA Task 16 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.30
NSA Task 18 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.33
NSA Task 2 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.11
NSA Task 2.1 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.10
NSA Task 2.2 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.10
NSA Task 2.3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.10
NSA Task 20 compliance status	0.5	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.36
NSA Task 20.1 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.34
NSA Task 20.2 compliance status	0	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.35
NSA Task 20.3 compliance status	0	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.35
NSA Task 20.5 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.36
NSA Task 20.6 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.36
NSA Task 24 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.40
NSA Task 24.1 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.38
NSA Task 24.2 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.39
NSA Task 24.3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.39
NSA Task 24.4 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.39
NSA Task 24.9 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.40
NSA Task 25 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.45
NSA Task 25.1 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.42
NSA Task 25.2 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.43
NSA Task 25.3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.43
NSA Task 25.4 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.44
NSA Task 25.5 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.44
NSA Task 25.6 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.44
NSA Task 26 compliance status	0.5	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.47
NSA Task 26.2 compliance status	0	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.46
NSA Task 3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.13
NSA Task 30 compliance status	0.5	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.50
NSA Task 33 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.53
NSA Task 34 compliance status	0.5	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.57
NSA Task 34.1 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.55
NSA Task 34.2 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.55
NSA Task 34.3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.56
NSA Task 35 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.58
NSA Task 35.3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.58
NSA Task 35.4 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.58
NSA Task 37 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.60

…and 23 more in the API.

Extracted text

← p.10 · page 11 of 88 · p.12 → · see this page in the PDF

Seventeenth Quarterly Report of the Independent Monitor 
for the Oakland Police Department 
April 28, 2014 
Page 10 
 
 
OPD is in Phase 2 compliance with Task 2. 
 
Compliance Status:   
Phase 1:  In compliance 
Phase 2:  In compliance 
 
Next Steps: 
During the next reporting period, we will again confer with IAD command staff regarding 
workload trends and staffing requirements. 
 
 
Task 3:  IAD Integrity Tests 
 
Requirements:   
IAD shall be proactive as well as reactive. 
1. 
IAD shall conduct integrity tests in situations where members/employees are the 
subject of repeated allegations of misconduct. 
2. 
IAD shall have frequency standards, among other parameters, for such integrity 
tests.   
(Negotiated Settlement Agreement III. C.) 
 
Background: 
OPD has been in compliance with this Task since the sixth reporting period.   
 
Discussion: 
As previously reported, on January 25, 2007, OPD published Internal Affairs Policy & 
Procedures 07-01, Integrity Testing, which incorporates the requirements of this Task.  The 
Department updated this policy in January 2009.  The revised policy also incorporates the 
requirements of Task 3.  As the Department has trained at least 95% of relevant personnel on this 
revised policy, we find OPD in continued Phase 1 compliance with this Task.  
 
Task 3.1 requires that IAD conduct integrity tests in situations where members/employees are 
the subject of repeated allegations of misconduct (compliance standard:  Yes/No); and Task 3.2 
requires that IAD’s integrity tests be conducted in accordance with the frequency standards and 
other parameters IAD has established (compliance standard:  90%). 
 
To assess the Department’s Phase 2 compliance with these subtasks, we reviewed files – 
including operations plans, after-action reports, supporting documents, and evidence – related to 
the 12 integrity tests that were conducted from October 1 through December 31, 2013.  Our 
review focused on the scope of the investigations, whether OPD conducted integrity tests on 
members and employees who were the subject of repeated allegations, and whether the selective 
integrity tests that OPD conducted complied with the parameters established by IAD.  Of the 12 
tests conducted during this reporting period, five were planned tests, in which the Integrity 
Case3:00-cv-04599-TEH   Document979   Filed04/28/14   Page11 of 88