seventeenth-quarterly-report.pdf

oaklandca · 1.0 MB · 88 pages extracted · 63 facts cite this document · retrieved 2026-07-15 · original location · open the PDF

Figures extracted from this document

Figures extracted from this document
Metric	Value	Unit	Period	Page
NSA Task 12 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.85
NSA Task 14 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.86
NSA Task 16 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.30
NSA Task 18 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.33
NSA Task 2 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.11
NSA Task 2.1 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.10
NSA Task 2.2 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.10
NSA Task 2.3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.10
NSA Task 20 compliance status	0.5	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.36
NSA Task 20.1 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.34
NSA Task 20.2 compliance status	0	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.35
NSA Task 20.3 compliance status	0	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.35
NSA Task 20.5 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.36
NSA Task 20.6 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.36
NSA Task 24 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.40
NSA Task 24.1 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.38
NSA Task 24.2 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.39
NSA Task 24.3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.39
NSA Task 24.4 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.39
NSA Task 24.9 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.40
NSA Task 25 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.45
NSA Task 25.1 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.42
NSA Task 25.2 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.43
NSA Task 25.3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.43
NSA Task 25.4 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.44
NSA Task 25.5 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.44
NSA Task 25.6 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.44
NSA Task 26 compliance status	0.5	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.47
NSA Task 26.2 compliance status	0	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.46
NSA Task 3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.13
NSA Task 30 compliance status	0.5	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.50
NSA Task 33 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.53
NSA Task 34 compliance status	0.5	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.57
NSA Task 34.1 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.55
NSA Task 34.2 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.55
NSA Task 34.3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.56
NSA Task 35 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.58
NSA Task 35.3 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.58
NSA Task 35.4 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.58
NSA Task 37 compliance status	1	compliance_status	2014-04-28	p.60

…and 23 more in the API.

Extracted text

← p.15 · page 16 of 88 · p.17 → · see this page in the PDF

Seventeenth Quarterly Report of the Independent Monitor 
for the Oakland Police Department 
April 28, 2014 
Page 15 
 
 
administratively closed because they did not involve MOR violations.  For example, in one, a 
citizen apparently suffering from mental illness was taken into protective custody.  She indicated 
that she wanted to lodge a complaint against one of the responding officers, but when a sergeant 
responded, she indicated that she had no complaint and only wanted to be transported to a 
hospital.  In another, the complainant was upset that he received redacted reports in response to 
his records request.  His concerns were satisfied in a follow-up call by Records Section 
personnel. 
 
One case involved an allegation that an officer failed to make an arrest in a domestic violence 
case 13 years ago.  Not only was the complaint untimely; the involved officers are no longer with 
the Department. 
 
The remaining allegations that were administratively closed comported with policy, in that the 
complaints either lacked specificity, claimed innocence of charges best left to appropriate 
adjudication venues to decide, or otherwise did not constitute MOR violations.  Where they were 
accompanied by allegations that warranted a full investigation, these additional allegations were 
investigated in accordance with policy.  We also identified several administrative closures in our 
Task 7.3 (Anonymous Complaints) review, and they are further discussed in that section. 
 
The cases resolved via summary finding were approved for such designation as required by 
policy.  In all of these cases, the interactions between officers and citizens were recorded on 
PDRDs, negating the need to interview all of the involved officers.  In three of the cases, the 
complainants alleged improper or false arrests.  In three others, excessive force was alleged, and 
in three others, the complainants complained of perceived improper searches.  Summary findings 
are further discussed in Task 5.   
 
OPD is in compliance with Task 4.10. 
 
OPD is in Phase 2 compliance with Task 4. 
 
Compliance Status:   
Phase 1:  In compliance 
Phase 2:  In compliance  
 
 
 
 
Case3:00-cv-04599-TEH   Document979   Filed04/28/14   Page16 of 88