fourteenth-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Independent Monitoring Team
Fourteenth Status Report of the Independent Monitor
Delphine Allen, et al., v. City of Oakland, et al.
July 31, 2009 to January 13, 2010
Page 83
1.
Personnel Assessment System (PAS)-Purpose (Task 40; S.A. VII.A.)
a.
Settlement Agreement Requirements
• By June 28, 2005, OPD must develop and implement a
Personnel Assessment System. This system must include a
computerized relational database to maintain, integrate and
retrieve data necessary for supervision and management of
OPD and its personnel. Specifically, this data must be used by
OPD to promote professional police practices; manage the risk
of police misconduct; and evaluate and audit the performance
of OPD members of all ranks, employees and OPD units,
subunits and shifts. The Settlement Agreement sets forth
particular information that must be captured by the system.
b.
Status of Compliance and Assessment
The compliance deadline for this task occurred in June 2005. During the ninth reporting
period, OPD completed a policy for PAS (formerly PIMS). The IMT found this policy in
conditional compliance with the Settlement Agreement.
OPD did not meet the Court’s deadlines for installing system software and hardware, in
part, due to delays from its vendor. However, during the ninth reporting period, OPD personnel
and City information technology staff devoted significant time and energy in developing an
interim computerized PAS system which was completed and made available to OPD supervisors
and commanders throughout the Department this reporting period.
During the ninth reporting period, with the assistance of a licensed therapist with
extensive experience working with OPD and other law enforcement agencies, OPD provided
training to supervisors regarding identifying and addressing at-risk behavior. The IMT was
impressed with the training which resulted in a number of supervisors identifying employees
who may be in need of counseling, remedial training, or other specialized assistance.
During the tenth reporting period, OPD published Department General Order D-17, PAS
and IPAS – Supervisors, Commanders, and Managers. While OPD trained at least 95% of its
supervisors, managers, and commanders on the policy, it did not provide training to the rank and
file regarding the new Personnel Assessment System. The Department has since trained all
personnel on the new system.
During the tenth reporting period, the IMT and its consultant, Dr. Samuel Walker, met
with the PAS Administration Unit, PAS Activity Review Panel members, OPD commanders,
and the City Attorney’s Office to discuss the status of PAS and ways to ensure its maximum
effectiveness. While Dr. Walker did not conduct a compliance assessment of PAS, he was
favorably impressed by the initial efforts of the PAS Administration Unit and PAS Activity
Review Panel based upon his familiarity with similar systems nationwide.