ninth-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Independent Monitoring Team
Ninth Status Report of the Independent Monitor
Delphine Allen, et al., v. City of Oakland, et al.
May 13, 2006, to November 30, 2006
Page 32
During the upcoming reporting periods, the IMT will determine whether OPD’s
actual practices comply fully with this Settlement Agreement provision.
9.
Contact of Citizen Complainants (Task 9; S.A. III.I.)
a.
Settlement Agreement Requirements
• By August 13, 2004, OPD must develop and, by
October 1, 2004, implement, a policy requiring that
IAD, or the investigator assigned to an investigation,
contact citizens who have made complaints as soon as
possible, in order to determine the nature, scope and
severity of the complaint, as well as to identify potential
witnesses and/or evidence as quickly as possible.
b.
Status of Compliance and Assessment
The implementation deadline for this task occurred in October 2004. During the
last two reporting periods, OPD completed the policies incorporating this Settlement
Agreement task and trained its personnel on the policies. The policies are General Order
M-3, Complaints Against Departmental Personnel or Procedures, and Training Bulletin
V-T.1, Internal Investigation Procedure Manual.
During this reporting period, the IMT audited OPD’s actual practice compliance
with this task. Task 9 requires that complainants be contacted as quickly as possible by
IAD or other OPD staff to begin gathering information regarding the complaint. One of
the most striking and beneficial improvements we observed this reporting period is how
quickly IAD contacts complainants to learn the details of their complaint and to begin the
investigative process. IAD was diligent in its efforts to contact complainants; it was not
uncommon for an investigative file to record repeated attempts to make initial
investigative contact with complainants. The greatly improved quality of OPD internal
investigations is in large part due to the quick contact of complainants by the IAD intake
unit. Complainants in 74% of the cases we reviewed were contacted as soon as possible
by IAD in accordance with this requirement. As OPD continues to improve in this area,
we expect it will shortly attain compliance with this task.
During the upcoming reporting periods, the IMT will determine whether OPD’s
actual practices comply fully with this Settlement Agreement provision.