ninth-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Independent Monitoring Team
Ninth Status Report of the Independent Monitor
Delphine Allen, et al., v. City of Oakland, et al.
May 13, 2006, to November 30, 2006
Page 45
comply with the NSA. Accordingly, OPD remains in policy compliance with this task.
According to OPD, it recently completed training more than 95% of relevant personnel
on the new policies. The IMT will verify training on these policies and report the results
in our next status report.
The IMT conducted an actual practices review of Task 20 in September 2004. As
of that review, OPD had not yet reached actual practice compliance with Task 20. OIG is
currently auditing OPD’s compliance with Task 20. OPD has recently started including
in its weekly management meetings reports on the span of control for selected OPD units.
This is a positive development given the importance of ensuring adequate field
supervision. We have observed occasional reports of units significantly exceeding the
1:8 span of control on certain days with little, if any, further discussion or inquiry by
commanders during the management meetings. According to OPD, it discusses these
issues outside of management meetings directly with relevant commanders.
OPD has not yet implemented the acting sergeant selection process set forth in its
new special order. If OPD does not implement the acting sergeant policy, it likely will
continue to face difficulty attaining compliance with this task much less ensuring that its
officers are being adequately supervised. Moreover, failing to address these deficiencies
as they arise may inadvertently encourage staff to ignore policy requirements.
During the upcoming reporting periods, the IMT will determine whether OPD has
conducted appropriate training on the new and revised policies, and whether OPD’s
actual practices comply with this Settlement Agreement provision.
4.
Members’, Employees’ and Supervisors’ Performance Reviews
(Task 21; S.A. IV.D.)
a.
Settlement Agreement Requirements
• By May 5, 2004, OPD must, based on contemporary
police standards and best practices, develop and
implement a member, employee and supervisor
performance review policy. The Settlement Agreement
sets forth certain criteria that must be included in this
policy.
• By July 7, 2004, OPD must hold its supervisors and
commanders/managers responsible for identifying
patterns of improper behavior of their subordinates.
Failure to identify patterns and instances of misconduct
when the supervisors or commanders/managers knew or
reasonably should have known of the misconduct shall
constitute grounds for discipline.