68,471 docs · 699,671 pages · 90,616 facts · as of 2026-08-01

Record D-4190 · nsa_report

ninth-report.pdf

oaklandca · 0.4 MB · 98 pages extracted · 17 facts cite this document · retrieved 2026-07-15 · original location · open the PDF

Figures extracted from this document

Figures extracted from this document
MetricValueUnitPeriodPage
NSA Task 1.2 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.23
NSA Task 1.4 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.24
NSA Task 18 compliance status0compliance_status2007-01-18p.47
NSA Task 2.1 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.27
NSA Task 3.1 compliance status0compliance_status2007-01-18p.27
NSA Task 3.2 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.28
NSA Task 37 compliance status0compliance_status2007-01-18p.71
NSA Task 42.3 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.78
NSA Task 42.6 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.79
NSA Task 46.1 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.89
NSA Task 46.3 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.89
NSA Task 46.4 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.89
NSA Task 48 compliance status0compliance_status2007-01-18p.93
NSA Task 51 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.7
NSA Task 51.1 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.97
NSA Task 51.2 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.97
NSA Task 51.3 compliance status1compliance_status2007-01-18p.97

Extracted text

· page 59 of 98 · · see this page in the PDF

Independent Monitoring Team Ninth Status Report of the Independent Monitor Delphine Allen, et al., v. City of Oakland, et al. May 13, 2006, to November 30, 2006 Page 54 During the upcoming reporting periods, the IMT will report on the status of General Order C-8 and on whether OPD’s actual practices comply with this Settlement Agreement provision. 5. Use of Force-Investigation of Criminal Misconduct (Task 28; S.A. V.E.) a. Settlement Agreement Requirements • By July 20, 2004, OPD must develop and implement a policy to report, as soon as possible, any use of force situation, citizen complaint, or other member/employee-involved action in which there is apparent evidence of criminal misconduct by a member/employee to the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office. b. Status of Compliance and Assessment The compliance deadline for this task occurred in July 2004. OPD initially revised General Order M-4, Coordination of Criminal Investigations to incorporate the requirements of this task. The IMT reviewed M-4 and determined that the draft did not comply with the Settlement Agreement because it did not provide for the required reporting to the District Attorney’s Office. In response, OPD drafted a separate policy, General Order M-4.1, Criminal Investigations Involving Active Law Enforcement, or a Member or Employee of the Department, focusing on the handling of criminal misconduct investigations. During the last reporting period, the IMT determined that General Order M-4.1 adequately incorporates this Settlement Agreement Requirement. OPD published this policy on April 21, 2006. According to OPD, it completed training on this policy during this reporting period. During the upcoming reporting periods, the IMT will confirm training compliance and will determine whether OPD’s actual practices comply with this Settlement Agreement provision. 6. IAD Investigation Priority (Task 29; S.A. V.F.) a. Settlement Agreement Requirements • By July 20, 2004, OPD must develop and implement a policy to coordinate its administrative investigation of a member/employee with the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office if a criminal proceeding is potentially viable.