FY 2026-27 Proposed Midcycle Budget
City ResolutionFiled under council matter 26-0787
Subject: FY 2026-27 Proposed Midcycle Budget From: Finance Department Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution (1) Adopting The Midcycle Budget For Fiscal Years 2026-27 And Appropriating Funds And Revenues To Cover Expenditures Approved By Said Budget; And (2) Authorizing The City Admi
Extracted text
Equity Consideration: Restoring O&M resources helps maintain equitable service delivery by ensuring departments have the operational resources necessary
and maintains ongoing public engagement efforts.
Police Commission
Reductions
Proposal to freeze 1.0 FTE CPRA Attorney hinders CPRA's ability to provide timely legal analysis and support to the Complaint Investigators.
Equity Consideration: This reduction will disproportionately affect communities of colors, who are more likely to rely on CPRA to address police accountability.
1.
Proposal to freeze 2.0 FTE Complaint Investigator II positions reduces the number of investigators to seven (7), which prevents CPRA from adequately investigating
complaints.
Equity Consideration: Freezing these positions will disproportionately impact communities of color who rely on CPRA to conduct independent police oversight
investigations. Adequate investigator staffing is essential to uphold CPRA’s mandate, maintain public trust, and ensure that all communities—particularly those
most impacted by police interactions—receive fair, timely, and thorough investigations.
2.
Inspector General
The Office of the Inspector General is maintaining its current budget with no significant changes. As such, there are no anticipated service impacts. No equity analysis needed.
Public Ethics Commission
Restorations
Reallocates the Democracy Dollars program funding by adding $252,210 for Democracy Dollars software and eliminates $372,135 from contract funds. In 2022, the voters
passed Measure W to replace the City’s Limited Public Financing Program with the Democracy Dollars public financing program, administered by the Public Ethics
Commission (PEC). Under the Program, all eligible Oakland residents will receive vouchers which they may contribute to a candidate for local office. This funding is
necessary for building the software platform that will be used to assign, track, and redeem Democracy Dollars vouchers which will be mailed each election cycle to
around 250,000 Oakland residents. Without this software, the Democracy Dollars Program cannot be implemented.
Equity Consideration: The Democracy Dollars Program is designed to address disparities across income and race produced by the traditional campaign finance
system. De-funding the software contract would delay program implementation for future election cycles and will result in an opportunity loss particularly for
candidates lacking connections to personal wealth or wealthy donor networks due to historical and ongoing effects of racism as well as residents from low-income
communities of color the Program is designed to draw into greater civic.
1.
Preserves the Limited Public Financing program by adding $150,000 in contract costs. The LPF is a public financing program for candidates running for City Council
district office, administered by the PEC, which has existed for over two decades. The LPF Program serves Oakland’s democracy and equity goals by reducing the risk of
corruption or its appearance, reducing barriers for non-wealthy candidates to run for office, and by allowing participating candidates to spend more time talking to
constituents instead of fundraising. The prior LPF was repealed with the passage of Measure W (2022) to enact a more robust and comprehensive public financing
program, the Democracy Dollars Program; however, when that Program could not be implemented for the 2024 or 2026 elections, City Council voted to bring back the
LPF Program so that there would be no gap in public financing while the Democracy Dollars Program is being set up. Unused LPF funds have traditionally always carried
forward to be used in future elections, which enables the Program to offer more public support to candidates. This proposal ensures expected funds are available to
support candidates running for council district office.
Equity Consideration: The PEC’s mission, as articulated in Measure W, is to “empower all Oakland residents with an opportunity to meaningfully participate in the
campaign process” and to ensure that “access to networks of wealthy contributors is not a prerequisite for candidates to run competitive campaigns for elected
office.” (OMC 3.15.030(A).) Deleting carryforward funds this election cycle will eliminate funds available to distribute to participating LPF candidates, which may harm
the City’s democracy and equity goals. Eliminating public financing funding will have a greater impact on candidates who are not personally wealthy or connected
to networks of wealth, and are more reliant on the City’s public financing program to run a competitive campaign. Because Oakland's campaign donor base comes
disproportionately from whiter and richer communities in Oakland, cutting this support may disproportionately impact candidates whose main support is from
more diverse and lower-income communities.
2.
Race & Equity
Restorations
Restores 1.0 FTE Data Analyst and freezing 1.0 vacant Administrative Assistant II will enable an additional element of technical assistance regarding data collection
strategies, maintenance and utilization to complete equity impact analysis and implement meaningful measures related to City services/actions. Administrative duties
will be spread between four staff members to minimize impact on other DRE functions.
Equity Consideration: There will be no, or negligible negative impact on services to marginalized communities. The addition of data analysis expertise will enhance
the impact of DRE’s work with departments and City leadership to advance fairness and justice in its services and actions for these communities and all of Oakland.
1.
Workplace & Employment Standards
Restorations
Restores 1.0 FTE for a Labor Standards Investigations Supervisor (placeholder for costing: “Complaint Investigator III”) and reallocates $37,350 in position line items for the
Supervisor and the Investigator to establish parity with pay for other Supervisors and journey-level positions in