Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting
Informational ReportFiled under council matter 12-0351
Subject: Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting From: City Administrator's Office Recommendation: Receive A Presentation And Hold Discussion On The Mayor's Proposed Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-2015
Extracted text
Deanna J. Santana, City Administrator
Subject: Proposed FY 13-15 Proposed Policy Budget
Date: April 25, 2013
Page 11
Professional Staff (Civilian)
Gap to
Fill Need
2013-14
Budget
2014-15
Budget
2015-16
Budget
Total
Field Operations
0
Police Services Technician 11
0
0
Police Evidence Technician
15
5
10
15
Records Management
0
Police Records Specialist
5
5
5
Police Records Supervisor
1
1
1
Crime Lab
0
Criminalist 11
2
2
2
Criminalist 111
2
2
2
Latent Fingerprint Examiner 11
1
1
1
Communications (911)
0
Police Communications Dispatcher
17(ind 5
in
proposed
budget]
10 (incl 5
in
proposed
budget)
5
• 2
12
Police Communications Supervisor
3
2
1
3
Business Intelligence & Crime
Analysis
0
Admin Analyst II
10
5
5
10
Total
56
20
18
18
56
3) Please provide additional information about the 4**^ Police Scenario.
The April 2, 2013 budget outlook presentation to City Council contained, on a slide titled
"Budget Deficit Scenarios," four different police staffing scenarios. These scenarios were 1)
the baseline scenario of just one academy during the two-year budget period; 2) one academy
per year; 3) two academies per year; and 4) one academy per year, a lateral recruitment for
20 hires in the second year, and the continuation throughout the two-year period of the
recently approved contracts with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) and Alameda County
Sheriffs Office (ACSO) for supplemental police patrol services.
The fourth scenario was devised as a new option that falls in between two other options, in
terms of cost and staffing level achieved, one academy per year and one academy in the first
year, two in the second, to illustrate the various combinations that can exist and the impact to
the City's shortfall. In terms of staffing levels, it would achieve the same level as one
academy per year plus an additional 20 beginning in FY14-15 and continuing thereafter. As
shown in the slide introducing the scenario, it resuhs in total GPF expenditures and shortfall
that is $2.4M greater in FY13-14 and $7.6M greater in FY14-15 compared to one academy
per year.
Item:
City Council
April 30, 2013