Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting
Informational ReportFiled under council matter 12-0351
Subject: Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting From: City Administrator's Office Recommendation: Receive A Presentation And Hold Discussion On The Mayor's Proposed Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-2015
Extracted text
ATTACHMENT A
Case3:00-cv-04599-TEH Document911 Filed03/04/13 Pagelot3
s
o
U
13
U
CO
s
" J r-
-1
'a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DELPHINE ALLEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
V.
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al..
Defendants.
MASTER CASE FILE
NO. COO-4599 TEH
ORDER APPOINTING
COMPLIANCE DIRECTOR
Pursuant to the December 12, 2012 order, the Court hereby appoints Thomas C.
Frazier to serve as the Compliance Director. Commissioner Frazier's resume is attached to
this order. He will begin on March 11, 2013, and will re-locate to the Oakland area.
On March 4, 2013, Defendant City of Oakland filed a response detailing the monetary
compensation received by the Chief of Police and City Administrator. The City reported that
the annual monetary compensation paid to the Chief of Police is $257,973, including a base
salary of $221,998 and longevity pay, a uniform allowance, and an education premium
totaling $35,975. The City reported that the City Administrator receives annual monetary
compensation of $282,000, including a base salary of $273,000 and an auto allowance of
$9000. The City did not include in these figures "vacation, executive leave, or other types of
leave or benefits that an employee has the option to cash out or use." Defs.' Mar. 4, 2013
Response at 2. The City did not mdicate any projected changes to the reported
compensation.'
'The Court interprets the City's silence on this matter to indicate that the Chief of
Police and City Administrator will not receive any cost-of-living or other armual increases
over the next three years. See Mar. 1, 2013 Order at 1 ("The filed information shall include
any projected increases or decreases over the next three years."). If tiiere are any such
mcreases during the Compliance Director's term, the Court may modify the Compliance
Director's salary accordingly.