68,471 docs · 699,671 pages · 89,501 facts · as of 2026-07-31

Record D-4530 · staff_report

Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting

legistar · 0.8 MB · 84 pages extracted · 0 facts cite this document · retrieved 2026-07-17 · original location · open the PDF

Informational ReportFiled under council matter 12-0351 introduced 2013-03-07
Subject: Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting From: City Administrator's Office Recommendation: Receive A Presentation And Hold Discussion On The Mayor's Proposed Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-2015

Extracted text

· page 5 of 84 · · see this page in the PDF

ATTACHMENT A Case3:00-cv-04599-TEH Document911 Filed03/04/13 Pagelot3 s o U 13 U CO s " J r- -1 'a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DELPHINE ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, V. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.. Defendants. MASTER CASE FILE NO. COO-4599 TEH ORDER APPOINTING COMPLIANCE DIRECTOR Pursuant to the December 12, 2012 order, the Court hereby appoints Thomas C. Frazier to serve as the Compliance Director. Commissioner Frazier's resume is attached to this order. He will begin on March 11, 2013, and will re-locate to the Oakland area. On March 4, 2013, Defendant City of Oakland filed a response detailing the monetary compensation received by the Chief of Police and City Administrator. The City reported that the annual monetary compensation paid to the Chief of Police is $257,973, including a base salary of $221,998 and longevity pay, a uniform allowance, and an education premium totaling $35,975. The City reported that the City Administrator receives annual monetary compensation of $282,000, including a base salary of $273,000 and an auto allowance of $9000. The City did not include in these figures "vacation, executive leave, or other types of leave or benefits that an employee has the option to cash out or use." Defs.' Mar. 4, 2013 Response at 2. The City did not mdicate any projected changes to the reported compensation.' 'The Court interprets the City's silence on this matter to indicate that the Chief of Police and City Administrator will not receive any cost-of-living or other armual increases over the next three years. See Mar. 1, 2013 Order at 1 ("The filed information shall include any projected increases or decreases over the next three years."). If tiiere are any such mcreases during the Compliance Director's term, the Court may modify the Compliance Director's salary accordingly.