68,471 docs · 699,671 pages · 90,616 facts · as of 2026-08-01

Record D-4175 · nsa_report

fourteenth-report.pdf

oaklandca · 0.5 MB · 113 pages extracted · 42 facts cite this document · retrieved 2026-07-15 · original location · open the PDF

Figures extracted from this document

Figures extracted from this document
MetricValueUnitPeriodPage
NSA Task 1 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.23
NSA Task 11 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.40
NSA Task 13 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.41
NSA Task 14 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.42
NSA Task 15 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.44
NSA Task 16 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.46
NSA Task 18 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.48
NSA Task 19 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.50
NSA Task 2 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.25
NSA Task 20 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.51
NSA Task 21 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.53
NSA Task 23 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.55
NSA Task 25 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.64
NSA Task 27 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.67
NSA Task 28 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.69
NSA Task 29 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.70
NSA Task 3 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.27
NSA Task 31 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.73
NSA Task 33 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.77
NSA Task 34 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.79
NSA Task 36 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.82
NSA Task 37 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.83
NSA Task 38 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.85
NSA Task 4 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.29
NSA Task 40 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.90
NSA Task 43 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.96
NSA Task 44 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.99
NSA Task 45 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.102
NSA Task 46 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.105
NSA Task 47 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.107
NSA Task 48 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.107
NSA Task 49 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.109
NSA Task 5 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.32
NSA Task 50 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.110
NSA Task 51 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.111
NSA Task 51.2 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.112
NSA Task 6 compliance status0compliance_status2010-01-13p.33
NSA Task 8 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.36
NSA Task 9 compliance status1compliance_status2010-01-13p.37
NSA tasks in compliance32tasks_of_512010-01-13p.20

…and 2 more in the API.

Extracted text

· page 103 of 113 · · see this page in the PDF

Independent Monitoring Team Fourteenth Status Report of the Independent Monitor Delphine Allen, et al., v. City of Oakland, et al. July 31, 2009 to January 13, 2010 Page 98 3. Promotional Consideration (Task 46; S.A. X.C.1.) a. Settlement Agreement Requirements • By July 8, 2003, OPD’s promotion policy must be modified so that sustained misconduct cases against a member/employee are an important factor in determining promotability, including presumptive ineligibility for promotion for twelve months following the sustained finding of a Class I violation. • The Settlement Agreement further requires the Chief of Police to consider the following criteria, in addition to other factors, in making promotional determinations: o Commitment to community policing; o Quality of citizen contacts; o Number of citizen complaints; o Instances of unnecessary use of force; and o Support for Departmental integrity measures. b. Status of Compliance and Assessment The compliance deadline for this task occurred in July 2003. As we previously reported, OPD drafted a memorandum from the Office of the Chief of Police addressing these Settlement Agreement requirements. The IMT reviewed the memorandum and found that it was too vague to facilitate compliance with the Settlement Agreement. OPD subsequently decided not to publish the memorandum until the OPD policy defining Class I and Class II offenses was published in M-3, Complaints Against Departmental Personnel or Procedures. OPD completed M-3 during the seventh reporting period, and we reported that OPD was in policy compliance with this task based on information provided by OPD regarding the status of the Chief of Police memorandum. While auditing this task during the ninth reporting period, we learned that OPD never finalized or published the Chief of Police memorandum or any other policy incorporating the requirements of this task. During the tenth reporting period, the Department published the Chief of Police memorandum on promotional consideration. During the current reporting period OPD published Policy & Procedure 08-02, Personnel Division Policy and Procedure Manual, which outlines the materials required to be included in promotional packets provided to the Chief and others for consideration. During the sixth reporting period, the IMT assessed OPD’s compliance with this task. Though the IMT determined that most of the Settlement Agreement’s required factors were