ninth-report.pdf
Figures extracted from this document
Extracted text
Independent Monitoring Team
Ninth Status Report of the Independent Monitor
Delphine Allen, et al., v. City of Oakland, et al.
May 13, 2006, to November 30, 2006
Page 52
During this reporting period, OPD completed the following critical subsidiary use
of force policies: General Order C-4, Safety Equipment; General Order K-9, Department
Canine Program; Training Bulletin III-B.4, Handcuffing Techniques; Training Bulletin
V-G, Use of Police Canines; Training Bulletin III-H.1, Use of Taser; Training Bulletin
III-H.2, Use of Handheld Impact Weapons; Training Bulletin V-F.2, Use of Chemical
Agents; Training Bulleing III-X, Deadly Force and Vehicles; and Training Bulletin III-N,
Recognizing and Handling Mentally Disturbed People. The Court ordered completion of
the majority of the subsidiary policies by August 1, 2006, and the remaining policies by
October 1, 2006, with training on all policies to be completed no later than December 30,
2006. OPD met the policy publication deadlines and has reported that it already has met
or is on target to meet the training deadlines established by the Court. The IMT will
verify OPD’s training figures and report on them in our next status report.
Like the new use of force reporting policies, the new use of force investigation
policies also represent a significant enhancement over prior policy. Consistent with
contemporary law enforcement standards, the new policies require OPD supervisors to
respond to the field when officers use certain types of force and to review these incidents
for consistency with the law and OPD policies, procedures, and training. Supervisors are
also required to assess whether officers used proper tactics; reasonable verbal means to
attempt to resolve incidents without force, if time and circumstances permitted; and
whether the force was de-escalated or stopped when appropriate.
During the upcoming reporting periods, the IMT will determine whether OPD’s
actual practices comply with this Settlement Agreement provision.
3.
Use of Force Review Board (UFRB) (Task 26; S.A. V.C.)
a.
Settlement Agreement Requirements
• By July 20, 2004, OPD must develop and implement a
policy to enhance the Use of Force Review Board. The
Settlement Agreement sets forth certain criteria that
must be included in this policy.
b.
Status of Compliance and Assessment
The compliance deadline for this task occurred in July 2004. During the last
reporting period, OPD completed General Order K-4.1, Force Review Boards. This
policy incorporates the Settlement Agreement’s requirements for this task. OPD also
trained over 95% of relevant personnel on this policy. OPD committed substantial time
and energy to this project and was able to complete both the policy and training by the
court-ordered deadlines.
During the upcoming reporting periods, the IMT will determine whether OPD’s
actual practices comply with this Settlement Agreement provision.