Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting
Informational ReportFiled under council matter 12-0351
Subject: Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting From: City Administrator's Office Recommendation: Receive A Presentation And Hold Discussion On The Mayor's Proposed Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-2015
Extracted text
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Subject: Proposed FY 13-15 Proposed Policy Budget
Date: June 12,2013
Page 6
direction, staff can revise the repayment plan, and one option is to smooth the amount of
$754,388 over four year.
Of note, fund #4100 should have been paying for vehicle replacement and the amount has not
been factored in the expenditure. If we slow down the repayment, it will hinder the City's ability
to achieve the goal to include vehicle replacement in this fund.
4) On p. D-61, regarding Miscellaneous General Purpose Fund (GPF) revenue. Please
explain the fluctuations and overall decreases in revenues.
The following table provides the major miscellaneous revenues in the General Purpose Fund
by source. Please note that there are various other small revenues in this category that together
amount to lessi^ thah $200,000. The fluctuations are largely driven by the timing of one time
revenues most notably sale of land and property.
General Purpose Fund
Miscellaneous Revenues
Audited
.Actuals.
f.Y2010^;i1
'
. Audited
Actuals
FY 2011-12
Year End
Projection
FY 2012-13
Proposed
Budget
FY 2013-14"
. Proposed
Budget
FY 2014-15
. Five-Year
-Forecast
FY 2015-16
Five-Year
Forecast
FY 2016-17
i Five-Year
Forecast
FY 2017-18
Sales of Land/Property
$4,470,000
$31,391,518
$ 325,000 $
$4,000,000
$
-
Coliseum Revenue
$
136,666
$
165,408
$ 160,679
$ 165,408
$
165,408 $ 165,408
$ 165,408 $ 165,408
Billboard Revenue On Going
$
$
$
$ 475,000
$
475,000 $ 475,000
$ 475,000 $ 475,000
Billboard Revenue One-Time $ • -
$
$
$ 475,000 $
$
-
$
$
-
5) On p. E-32 of the Proposed Budget, "Collections/Mandatory Garbage" (described on p.
E-34 - Includes Business Tax & Code Enforcement) is shown as dropping from 13 to 11
FTE from FY 12-13 to 13-14. On p. E-33, "Collections/Mandatory Garbage" is shown as
having a budget cut (expenditures dropping from 1,408,202 in 12-13 to 1,337,486 in 13-14)
but also an expected revenue spike (158,600 in 12-13 to 264,591 in 13-14). Why is a spike in
collections reyehue expected when FTE and expenditures are dropping? Are there other
uncollected coliections amounts not handled by Collections/Mandatory Garbage?
The.revenue increase.reflects revenue adjustments due to increases that were observed in prior
year actuals—^to clarify,.the spike in revenue collections is not related to changes in staffing or
expenditure levels.
Any uncollected revenues that are subject to a lien process are not handled by Collections
/Mandatory Garbage. False alarm fees and collections of parking citation revenues are also not
handled by Co I lection s/Mandatory Garbage, the latter are provided by ACS-Xerox, the City's
parking citations management contractor through methods including tax intercepts, DMV
registration holds, and other processes.
Public Works