Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting
Informational ReportFiled under council matter 12-0351
Subject: Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting From: City Administrator's Office Recommendation: Receive A Presentation And Hold Discussion On The Mayor's Proposed Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-2015
Extracted text
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Subject: Proposed FY 13-15 Proposed Policy Budget
Date: May 13,2013
•
•
Page 19
support for the Library has steadily declined. Under the proposed FY 2013-15 Budget, the
General Purpose Fund support for the Library is 34% compared to Measure Q funding at 66%.
Assuming the City continues to hold General Purpose Fund support for the Library at the same
level provided in FY 2000/2001 - $9,059 million (Measure Q minimum), annual Measure Q
revenues will be $3.0 - $4.0 M less than budgeted expenditures based on current service levels
and models in FY 2013-14. The Proposed Budget indicates that the available Measure Q fund
balance would be depleted by the end of FY 2014-15. Historically, the Library has spent less
than the approved budget and a modest Measure Q fund balance may remain at the end of FY
2015.
During the next fiscal year library staff will conduct a study and implement altemative service
models to deliver services within available funding sources.
Public Works
1) With respect to the Financial Summaries section of the Proposed Budget, is it accurate
that there are no General Purpose Fund (GPF) expenses in Public Works?
No, it is not accurate—Public Works does receive General Purpose Funds. As noted in the
Proposed Budget, Public Works receives a relatively small allocation from the General Purpose
Fund at approximately $1.2M yearly, see pg. E-53. To clarify, in the Financial Summaries
portion of the Proposed Budget (see page D-10), it states that there are no GPF changes for
Public Works.
2) What is the rational for ehminating the 1 FTE clean community supervisor? (Pg. D-16)
The elimination of the 1.00 FTE Clean Community Supervisor was a budgetary clean-up item
resulting from a reclassification in which the new position was added but the position it replaced
remained in the budget There will be no service impacts.
3) What are the costs, including signage, maintenance, enforcement and stafHng, to
administer the Residential Parking Permit (RPP) program? What would the cost per
permit be to be fully cost-covering?
In the below table, the following costs and calculated values represent preliminary estimates
from departments. Before pursuing a fee increase, staff would need to undertake additional
analysis to verify the precision of these values.
FY 2011-12 Permits Revenue
Permits Issued in FY 2011-12
10,311
Average per Permit Revenue FY 2011-12
$
19