Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting
Informational ReportFiled under council matter 12-0351
Subject: Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting From: City Administrator's Office Recommendation: Receive A Presentation And Hold Discussion On The Mayor's Proposed Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-2015
Extracted text
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Subject: Proposed FY 13-15 Proposed Policy Budget
Date: May 13,2013
Page 20
Estimated Costs of the RPP Program
Parking Enforcement - Police Department
$
930,000
(permit issuance, appeals, customer service)
Parking Citation Assistance Center - Revenue
$
108,990
(permit issuance, appeals, customer service)
Transportation Services Division - Public Works
$
78,850
(PR, evaluation, legislation)
Traffic Maintenance Division -Public Works
$
4,725
(sign installation, replacement, maintenance)
Total Cost
$
1,122,565
Average Permit Revenue to be Cost Covering
$
108.87
Needed Increase In Average per Permit Cost
$
90.13
4) Regarding illegal dumping, what is the current average time to respond to resident
complaints? Under the proposed budget, what will be done to strengthen response to illegal
dumping?
The average response time to illegal dumping calls in Oakland has slowed due to staff resources.
Based on the current FY 2012-13 data, 72% of customer service requests are responded to by
Public Works (PW) staff within three (3) business days. Prior to the dissolution of the
Redevelopment Agency which eliminated 5.00 PTE's in Febmary 2012 and the end of the Waste
Management Settlement Agreement in the Illegal Dumping Unit, Public Works response rate
was 94% within 3 business days. In addition, equipment shortages due to the aging fleet have
also impacted service response times. At the current rate, it is projected that there will be an
increase from 13,080 customer service requests in FY 2011-12 to 18,000 projected for the
current fiscal year. The estimated 38% increase in service requests will further impact response
times. The Proposed Budget does provide an illegal dumping mitigation proposal listed in the
Policy Tradeoffs & Service Buybacks portion of the proposed budget that can be considered by
the City Council, if there is a desire to do so, (see page A-3 of the Proposed Budget)
5) With respect to the items titled Illegal Dumping and Litter Mitigation under the Policy
Tradeoffs & Service Buybacks section in the Proposed Budget, it looks like these cuts were
made in the recent past. Are there further cuts proposed in the Proposed Budget?
The Policy Tradeoffs and Service Buybacks section of the proposed budget includes lists of key
City services that were reduced or excluded in the proposed budget. The section on Cuts for
Possible Restoration generally lists services that were proposed for reduction in FY 2013-15,
whereas the section on Policy Tradeoffs generally covers services that have been left unfunded
due to State or federal influence or reduced over multiple years. These two groups are not
entirely mutually exclusive. To clarify, the illegal dumping and litter mitigation service levels in