Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting
Informational ReportFiled under council matter 12-0351
Subject: Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting From: City Administrator's Office Recommendation: Receive A Presentation And Hold Discussion On The Mayor's Proposed Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-2015
Extracted text
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Subject: Proposed FY 13-15 Proposed Policy Budget
Date: May 13,2013
Page 24
education or enforcement, new funding would need to be identified or the needed services
defined above would need to be adjusted.
11) Cross-Departmental Efficiency - Would a comprehensive inventory system for
department equipment and supplies generate budget savings over time? Which
departments already do this?
With respect to City supplies, in the past, the City had a centralized Citywide "Central Store"
where City Departments would purchase their supplies from. At some point, this "Central
Store" was disabled given high costs and subsequently, the management of supplies were
decentralized to Departments. In Public Works, vehicles and mobile equipment used by all
Departments are managed in an enterprise system known as FleetFocus. The Equipment
Services Division in Public Works tracks these assets. These assets are tracked by the
following information: Acquisition date and cost; maintenance costs for labor, parts and
commercial work, department of assignment, registration information, and disposal
information are recorded for each of the approximately 1,500 items in the fleet. In
accordance with the Fleet Utilization policy. Equipment Services works with using
departments to manage the fleet inventory and, as a result, over the last four years the fleet
has been reduced by 249 units.
12) Clarify reference to a "Council-approved Graffiti Abatement Program" and
positions to begin implementation of said program referenced in the Service Impacts
section material on Public Works
The Service Impacts section mistakenly refers to the City activities to support the graffiti
enforcement and abatement ordinance passed by City Council in January 2013 as a program.
The City Administrator's supplemental agenda report of December 14, 2012 regarding the
ordinance notes that its passage does not create a program. To access a copy of this report,
please visit:
http://oakland.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=2260996&GUID===530A244C-B3Cl-419A-
8A26-3904E2049C42.
However, the ordinance does create some new responsibilities, and related service
expectations, for the City. The City, like private property owners, is required to remove
graffiti that is visible from the street or right of way within a certain time period once notified
by the City Administrator. To implement this; the proposed budget includes two painter
positions, supported by Fund 1720 (Comprehensive Clean-Up). In the agenda report dated
December 11, 2012 from the City Attomey and Councilmember Nadel, it stated:
"This ordinance should not have any negative fiscal impacts, but may produce additional revenue through
cost recovery and penahies. The City Council and City Administrator will need to assess personnel and
fiscal needs for enforcement and administration. The Committee should consider asking City
Administration to return with an enforcement and administration plan within the 60 day period after
adoption and prior to the ordinance's effective date." The supplemental report issued by the City
Administrator on December 14, 2012 stated that, "we believe that the revenues will not cover the costs of a
dedicated, comprehensive program. (To view the December 11 report, please visit: