Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting

Case3:00-cv-04599-TEH Document930 Filed05/01/13 Page29of59 COMPLIANCE DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS: The Compliance Director Court order dated December 12, 2012 addresses the reporting duties of the Compliance Director, including the following: "Strategies to decrease the number of police misconduct complaints, claims, and lawsuits." This is a classic "three legged stool" of policy, training, and accountability. From the Chief down through the Command ranks, these requirements must be articulated, trained, modeled, and enforced. Institutionalization will occur only after a lengthy period of time with all components effectively implemented and enforced. Accountability will be addressed later in this report by increasing numbers of Sergeants to meet span of control criteria. Training at all levels of the Department will similarly be addressed in multiple areas of this Plan. OBJECTIVES: • Bring Task 20: Span of Control for Supervisors, into compliance. MONITOR 12™ QUARTERLY COMMENTS AS TO REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE: Task 20.2 requires that relevant squads - that is. Patrol squads, Problem-Solving Officer units. Crime Reduction Teams, Neighborhood Enforcement Team, Gang/Guns Investigation Task Force, and Foot Patrol - are actually supervised by their primary, or assigned, supervisors (compliance standard: 85%); Task 20.3 requires that a supen/isor's span of control for the Department's relevant squads - that is, Patrol squads, Problem-Solving Officer units. Crime Reduction Teams, Neighborhood Enforcement Team, Gang/Guns Investigation Task Force, and Foot Patrol - does not exceed a 1:8 ratio on a day-to-day basis (compliance standard: 90%); and Task 20.4 requires that the Department's Area Commanders make backfill decisions and that these decisions are 29