Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting
Informational ReportFiled under council matter 12-0351
Subject: Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting From: City Administrator's Office Recommendation: Receive A Presentation And Hold Discussion On The Mayor's Proposed Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-2015
Extracted text
FILED
21113 JUN 21 AM 8:57
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF OAKLAND
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR &
FROM: Donna Hom
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: FY 2013-2015 Proposed Policy Budget
DATE: June 12, 2013
City Administrator
Date
Approval
;/s/Deanna J. Santana
6/12/13
The purpose 'of this memorandum is to transmit to the full City Council a fourth set of responses
to quesfions raised by City Councilmembers regarding the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013-2015 Proposed
Policy Budget. We have answered as many questions as possible; however, some questions still
require more staff analy sis, and as such, we will answer any remaining quesfions through
additional supplemental memos. To the extent that any additional information becomes available
on any of the below questions or questions in past supplemental memorandums, we will confinue
to update the City Council accordingly.
DISCUSSION
General
1) Provide ihforihatioii about the proposed Graphic Design Specialist Position.
As a background. Graphic Design Specialist is currenfiy vacant and was cut during the FY 20IS-
IS Policy Budget development process. .However, legal counsel advised staff that the City will
not be able to bring any graphic design work to outside vendors if the position is not fully
funded. Staff has requested $80,000 from the General Purpose Fund for portion of the position.
The balance of the funding of $34,298 in year one and $37,072 in year two will come from the
non-General Purpose Fund.
2) Provide the base cost for each and every new/additional/add/delete/upgraded position in
the Proposed Budget
The detailed list of newly added and deleted positions in comparison with the Adopted Amended
FY 2012-13 Policy Budget is displayed in Attachment A. Please note that the cost to add
positions and related saving from deleting positions refiect net salary savings/costs only (does
not include benefits, pension, and overhead related costs).
3) Of the nearly 1,400 Temporary Part-Time (TFT) employees, how many have been in
their positions for the last two years? How much would it cost for the Administration to
conduct an evaluation to determine which TPT positions should more logically and fairly