Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting
Informational ReportFiled under council matter 12-0351
Subject: Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting From: City Administrator's Office Recommendation: Receive A Presentation And Hold Discussion On The Mayor's Proposed Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-2015
Extracted text
Case3:00-cv-04599-TEH Document930 Filed05/01/13 Page26of59
PAS Reviews Completed
Supervisor Rec- DO
action
•
e
•e
'5
D*
O
' i
S!
Supervisor Etec -
MO alio ring
k o
.§ i ll
& £
s
'4
- :
B B
a a
i !
Dep. Cbief Concurs w
Commander
i !
PAS Panel Concuri w
DC
Pending
1|
g -
S . |
o £
£ i
l i
2011
January
11
9
82%
0
0%
2
18%
0
0%
10
90%
11
100%
10
90%
0
11
February
9
8
89%
0
0%
1
11%
0
0%
9
100%
9
100%
8
89%
0
5
Maitti'
17
10
59%
1
5%
4
24%
2
11%
17
100%
17
100%
17
100%
0
11
A f r i i
12
11
92%
0
0%
0
0%
1
8%
12
100%
12
100%
12
100%
0
18
May
10
6
60%
0
0%
2
20%
2
20K
10
100%
10
100%
10
100%
0
7
June
8
6
80%
0
0%
1
10%
1
10%
8
100%
8
100%
8
100%
0
7
July
11
7
63%
0
0%
4
36%
0
0%
9
90%
10
90%
10
100%
0
16
A u | u i l
2
2
lOOX
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
0
23
Seplembci
19
13
es%
0
0%
5
26%
1
5%
18
94%
18
94%
19
100%
9
16
October
12
10
83%
0
0%
2
17%
0
0%
11
92%
11
92%
12
100%
0
26
November
16
11
69%
1
1%
2
13%
3
19%
15
94%
10
G3%
12
7S%
0
47
December
22
16
73%
0
0%
6
17%
0
0%
21
95%
19
86%
22
100%
0
14
Total
149
109
2
29
10
142
137
142
9
201
Averaa*
1Z4
9.1
77%
a2
1%
Z4
0
as
11.B
9696
11.4
9 4 %
ILB
96%
aB
l f i . 0
1012
January
7
S
71%
0
0%
2
29%
0
0%
7
100%
7
100%
7
100%
7
14
February
S
4
80%
0
0%
1
20%
0
0%
2
40%
2
40%
2
40%
0
59
March
19
12
G3%
0
0%
4
21%
3
16%
IS
95%
17
89%
18
95%
33
7
Aiall
25
17
68%
0
0%
5
20%
3
12%
2S
100%
25
100%
25
100%
22
41
May
27
17
63%
0
0%
2
7%
0
0%
26
96%
25
92%
17
100%
14
5S
June
43
41
95%
0
0%
1
5%
0
0%
41
95%
42
98%
43
100%
15
17
July
66
61
92%
1
5%
3
5%
2
30%
65
98%
65
98%
64
97%
0
18
A u [ u i l
32
29
90%
1
0%
2
6%
0
0%
27
84%
26
S l %
27
84%
a
35
Septembei
IS
10
67%
1
0.1
3
20%
1
7%
15
100%
11
73%
13'
87%
1
16
Total
239
196
3
24
9
226
220
226
100
265
Average
53.1
43.6
80%
0.7
ox
S3
1096
1.0
1096
50.2
9096
433 . 9096
50.2
9096 22.2
58.9
In the last reporting period, we began reviewing the PAS histories of
officers who had either a Level 1 use of force or been arrested for a
criminal offense in the past year. For the period under review, only
one officer met these criteria for examination by virtue of
participation in an officer-involved shooting. The officer exceeded a
threshold for complaints, but was not selected for review because
most of the relevant activity had been considered at the review
prompted by the OlS.
Our most recent report focused on three issues relevant to the
functioning of the risk management system: the limited information
used in reviews by supen/isors; the extent to which reviewed cases
resulted in monitoring or intervention; and the effectiveness of risk
reduction efforts when officers continued to exceed thresholds.
Regarding the first issue, we are aware of the efforts to make the
complete use of force reports - rather than just summaries -
available to supervisors, and we will continue to review the
26