Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting
Informational ReportFiled under council matter 12-0351
Subject: Fiscal Year 2013-2015 Special Budget Meeting From: City Administrator's Office Recommendation: Receive A Presentation And Hold Discussion On The Mayor's Proposed Budget For Fiscal Year 2013-2015
Extracted text
CompStat will be the response of the distrirt captains and other unit leaders to the
challenging new format and the relentless focus on detail that is envisaged for the
reinvigorated CompStat process. Having met with the captains, Bratton Group team
members can report that several of the captains seemed ready for the challenge,
while others were more circumspect and suspicious.
Investigations Issues (Robbery and Burglary)
As noted in The Bratton Group's first report, homicides, robberies and burglaries
have all risen steeply since 2010, and these surges probably are not unrelated to a
parallel decline in sworn personnel since 2009. It seems clear that, with the current
staffing and current configurations in investigations, robberies and burglaries are
not being adequately investigated. The Bratton Group team believes that a
decentralization of both robbery and burglary investigations to the district level
could dramatically improve this situation by bringing investigative resources into
the field more quickly and ensuring sharper focus on, and quicker identification of,
local crime patterns. We have already noted that, under the current configuration
there is only one burglary detective for the entire city, a thankless assignment in a
city that recorded about 11,000 burglaries in 2012.
Robbery investigations are better staffed, with a lieutenant, sergeant and eight
investigators assigned to Major Crimes Section 2 (MCS2), which handles robberies
and non-gun assaults, but Bratton Group team members encountered a number of
bottlenecks and other problems that may be undercutting effective robbery
investigations.
First, MCS2 is reportedly absorbing a $480,000 funding cut which has had the effect
of suspending all call-outs of robbery investigators in the off hours. This means that
robbery investigators will rarely be on the scene of any robbery and will be leaving
the task of questioning victims and witnesses, in the immediate aftermath of the
crime, to police officers, who are largely untrained in investigative practice.
Second, there is apparently a lag of as much as three days before reports of
robberies (in the form of the pink copy of the report or "the pink") reach MCS2 for
assignment to investigators. This lag is largely caused by the need to enter robbery
reports into the database maintained by the Records Division. Yet, Forensic Logic
representatives told The Bratton Group team that any entry made by police officers
into databases tied to the Forensic Logic system should be available for others to
review within 20 minutes. The lag in relaying robbery reports, therefore, may be
reparable with changes in entry protocols.
Third, even without the lag at the Records Division, heavy caseloads and the burden
of processing in-custody arriests often delay the response of robbery investigators to
not-in-custody cases. The MCS2 lieutenant acknowledged that it might be as much
as five to seven working days before an investigator would contact a victim in a
given robbery.
The Bratton Group, LLC
29